Open access subject repositories: An overview

Subject repositories are open web collections of working papers or manuscript copies of published scholarly articles, specific to particular scientific disciplines. The first repositories emerged in the early 1990s, and in some fields of science they have become an important channel for the dissemination of research results. With quite strict inclusion criteria, 56 subject repositories were identified from a much larger number indexed in 2 repository indices. A closer study of these demonstrated a huge variety in sizes, organizational models, functions, and topics. When they first started to emerge, subject repositories catered to a strong market demand, but the later development of Internet search engines, the rapid growth of institutional repositories, and the tightening of journal publisher open access policies seems to be slowing their growth.

[1]  G. Franck.  Open access , 2012, Cell cycle.

[2]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Tim Brody,et al.  Size isn’t everything: sustainable repositories as evidenced by sustainable deposit profiles , 2007 .

[4]  Kenneth Thibodeau.  If you build it, will it fly? Criteria for success in a digital repository , 2007, J. Digit. Inf..

[5]  Paul Ginsparg.  Scholarly information architecture, 1989 - 2015 , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[6]  Rebecca Reznik-Zellen,et al.  Representation and Recognition of Subject Repositories , 2010, D Lib Mag..

[7]  Julie Kelly,et al.  Managing the Grey Literature of a Discipline Through Collaboration , 2005 .

[8]  B. Björk,et al.  Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[9]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Digital repositories ten years on: what do scientific researchers think of them and how do they use them? , 2012, Learn. Publ..

[10]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Anatomy of green open access , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Thomas Krichel,et al.  RePEc and Socionet as partners in a changing digital library environment, 1997 to 2004 and beyond , 2004 .

[12]  Mikael Laakso,et al.  Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed , 2014, Scientometrics.

[13]  Antonella De Robbio,et al.  Management eines internationalen Open Access-Archivs :das Beispiel E-LIS , 2009 .

[14]  Simon Lambert,et al.  Increasing the Productivity of Interactions Between Subject and Institutional Repositories , 2008 .

[15]  B. Björk,et al.  Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[16]  Laurent Romary,et al.  Comparing Repository Types - Challenges and barriers for subject-based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Libr. Syst..

[17]  Rebecca Reznik-Zellen,et al.  Trends in Large-Scale Subject Repositories , 2010, D Lib Mag..

[18]  B. Björk,et al.  Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  Jihyun Kim,et al.  Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  A. Ben Wagner,et al.  Open Access Citation Advantage: An Annotated Bibliography. , 2010, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

[22]  Alma Swan,et al.  The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date , 2010 .

[23]  Jingfeng Xia.  A Comparison of Subject and Institutional Repositories in Self-archiving Practices , 2008 .