Characterizing Pedophile Conversations on the Internet using Online Grooming

Cyber-crime targeting children such as online pedophile activity are a major and a growing concern to society. A deep understanding of predatory chat conversations on the Internet has implications in designing effective solutions to automatically identify malicious conversations from regular conversations. We believe that a deeper understanding of the pedophile conversation can result in more sophisticated and robust surveillance systems than majority of the current systems relying only on shallow processing such as simple word-counting or key-word spotting. In this paper, we study pedophile conversations from the perspective of online grooming theory and perform a series of linguistic-based empirical analysis on several pedophile chat conversations to gain useful insights and patterns. We manually annotated 75 pedophile chat conversations with six stages of online grooming and test several hypothesis on it. The results of our experiments reveal that relationship forming is the most dominant online grooming stage in contrast to the sexual stage. We use a widely used word-counting program (LIWC) to create psycho-linguistic profiles for each of the six online grooming stages to discover interesting textual patterns useful to improve our understanding of the online pedophile phenomenon. Furthermore, we present empirical results that throw light on various aspects of a pedophile conversation such as probability of state transitions from one stage to another, distribution of a pedophile chat conversation across various online grooming stages and correlations between pre-defined word categories and online grooming stages.

[1]  W. Shumar,et al.  Adult-Child Sex Advocacy Websites as SocialLearning Environments: A Content Analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Lynne Edwards,et al.  ChatCoder: Toward the Tracking and Categorization of Internet Predators , 2009 .

[3]  April Kontostathis,et al.  Comparison of Rule-based to Human Analysis of Chat Logs , 2009 .

[4]  Általános társadalom tudományok National Center for Missing and Exploited Children , 2011 .

[5]  Ethel Quayle,et al.  Child Pornography and Sexual Exploitation of Children Online , 2008 .

[6]  R. Snowden,et al.  An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. , 2005, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo Online child grooming: a literature review on the misuse of social networking sites for grooming children for sexual offences , 2009 .

[8]  Martin Bouchard,et al.  The structure and content of online child exploitation networks , 2010, ISI-KDD '10.

[9]  L. Olson,et al.  Entrapping the Innocent: Toward a Theory of Child Sexual Predators’ Luring Communication , 2007 .

[10]  Rachel O’Connell Cyberspace A TYPOLOGY OF CHILD CYBERSEXPLOITATION AND ONLINE GROOMING PRACTICES , 2003 .

[11]  Nick Pendar,et al.  Toward Spotting the Pedophile Telling victim from predator in text chats , 2007, International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007).

[12]  April Kontostathis,et al.  Text Mining and Cybercrime , 2010 .

[13]  George M. Mohay,et al.  Challenges of automating the detection of paedophile activity on the Internet , 2005, First International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE'05).

[14]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Regression diagnostics , 2020, Applied Quantitative Analysis for Real Estate.

[15]  R. O'Connell,et al.  A typology of cybersexploitation and online grooming practices , 2003 .