Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education

Objective: To study how income and educational level influence mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design and setting: Prospective analysis using individual level linkage of registries in Denmark. Participants: All patients 30–74 years old hospitalised for the first time with AMI in Denmark in 1995–2002. Main outcome measures: Relative risk (RR) of 30 day mortality and long term mortality (31 days until 31 December 2003) associated with income (adjusted for education) or educational level (adjusted for income) and further adjusted for sex, age, civil status, and comorbidity. Results: The study identified 21 391 patients 30–64 years old and 16 169 patients 65–74 years old. The 30 day mortality was 7.0% among patients 30–64 years old and 15.9% among those 65–74 years old. Among patients surviving the first 30 days, the long term mortality was 9.9% and 28.3%, respectively. The adjusted RR of 30 day mortality and long term mortality among younger patients with low compared with high income was 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.36 to 1.79) and 1.65 (1.45 to 1.85), respectively. The RR of 30 day and long term mortality among younger patients with low compared with high education was 1.24 (1.03 to 1.50) and 1.33 (1.11 to 1.59), respectively. The RR of 30 day and long term mortality among older patients with low compared with high income was 1.27 (1.15 to 1.41) and 1.38 (1.27 to 1.50), respectively. Older high and low education patients did not differ in mortality. Conclusion: This study shows that both educational level and income substantially and independently affect mortality after AMI, indicating that each indicator has specific effects on mortality and that these indicators are not interchangeable.

[1]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Bias related to the exclusion of the economically inactive in studies on social class differences in mortality. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  K. Muir,et al.  How do economic status and social support influence survival after initial recovery from acute myocardial infarction? , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[3]  G. Backer Evidence-based goals versus achievement in clinical practice in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: findings in EUROASPIRE II , 2002 .

[4]  P. Toutouzas,et al.  In-hospital mortality of habitual cigarette smokers after acute myocardial infarction; the "smoker's paradox" in a countrywide study. , 2001, European heart journal.

[5]  B. Hedblad,et al.  Trends in long‐term survival after myocardial infarction: less favourable patterns for patients from deprived areas , 2000, Journal of internal medicine.

[6]  D. Abrams,et al.  Socioeconomic status over the life course and stages of cigarette use: initiation, regular use, and cessation , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  P. Austin,et al.  Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Occupational class and cause specific mortality in middle aged men in 11 European countries: comparison of population based studies , 1998, BMJ.

[9]  L. Wilhelmsen,et al.  Are there socio-economic differences in survival after acute myocardial infarction? , 1996, European heart journal.

[10]  B. Gersh,et al.  Race, sex, poverty, and the medical treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. , 2000, Circulation.

[11]  J E Keil,et al.  Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. , 1993, Circulation.

[12]  P. Austin,et al.  Influence of education and income on atherogenic risk factor profiles among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[13]  J. Critchley,et al.  Mortality risk reduction associated with smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[14]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[15]  J V Tu,et al.  Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Zwisler,et al.  Hospital Variation in Mortality After First Acute Myocardial Infarction in Denmark From 1995 to 2002: Lower Short-Term and 1-Year Mortality in High-Volume and Specialized Hospitals , 2005, Medical care.

[17]  Markku Peltonen,et al.  Social patterning of myocardial infarction and stroke in Sweden: incidence and survival. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  J. Pell,et al.  Relation between socioeconomic deprivation and death from a first myocardial infarction in Scotland: population based analysis , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  D. Simons-Morton,et al.  Smoking, smoking cessation, and understanding of the role of multiple cardiac risk factors among the urban poor. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[20]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Pathways between socioeconomic determinants of health , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[21]  B. Hedblad,et al.  Myocardial infarction in an urban population: worse long term prognosis for patients from less affluent residential areas , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[22]  D. De Bacquer,et al.  educational level and risk profile of cardiac patients in the EUROASPIRE II substudy , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[23]  N. Goldschlager,et al.  Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era. , 2000, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[24]  L. Køber,et al.  The Prognostic Importance of Smoking Status at the Time of Acute Myocardial Infarction in 6676 Patients , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular risk.

[25]  M. Osler,et al.  The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  M. Woodward,et al.  Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register , 1997, BMJ.

[27]  MarkkuMähönen,et al.  Relationship of Socioeconomic Status to the Incidence and Prehospital, 28-Day, and 1-Year Mortality Rates of Acute Coronary Events in the FINMONICA Myocardial Infarction Register Study , 2000 .

[28]  B. Gersh,et al.  Socioeconomic status and outcome following acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[29]  A. Ellaway,et al.  Postcodes don't indicate individuals' social class , 1999, BMJ.

[30]  F. Diderichsen,et al.  Socioeconomic differences in the burden of disease in Sweden. , 2005, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[31]  V. Salomaa,et al.  Relationship of socioeconomic status to the incidence and prehospital, 28-day, and 1-year mortality rates of acute coronary events in the FINMONICA myocardial infarction register study. , 2000, Circulation.

[32]  C. Hart,et al.  Lifetime socioeconomic position and mortality: prospective observational study , 1997, BMJ.

[33]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Comparison of long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction in patients never graduated from high school with that in more educated patients. Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Widening socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in six Western European countries. , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.

[35]  G. De Backer Evidence-based goals versus achievement in clinical practice in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: findings in EUROASPIRE II. , 2002, Atherosclerosis. Supplements.

[36]  Johan P Mackenbach,et al.  Tackling socioeconomic inequalities in health: analysis of European experiences , 2003, The Lancet.

[37]  M. Schroll,et al.  Socioeconomic status and trends in risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in the Danish MONICA population, 1982–1992 , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[38]  H. Barron,et al.  Smoking and mortality following acute myocardial infarction: results from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 (NRMI 2). , 2002, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[39]  T. Christiansen Organization and financing of the Danish health care system. , 2002, Health policy.

[40]  T. F. Andersen,et al.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. , 1999, Danish medical bulletin.