Ecology Needs a Convention of Nomenclature

Many areas of science have adopted nomenclature rules that facilitate research and communication. In contrast, ecological terminology is constantly redefined across disciplines, plagued with synonymy and polysemy, and foundational terms (and the theories and hypotheses behind them) are overlooked. We contend that this situation handicaps the progress of ecology. We review the causes and consequences of terminological uncertainty and propose a convention of ecological nomenclature (CEN) as an indispensable requirement of ecological synthesis. The core components of a CEN are its endorsement by a transnational institution; a policy framework managed by an advisory committee; and a centralized, peer-reviewed revision of terminology whereby ecologists are proponents and users of a unique, open-access repository of terms, definitions, and ontologies. A CEN should become the basis of a cross-disciplinary platform of communication among ecologists, journals, and the public and aligns with the ongoing initiative toward data globalization in ecology and other disciplines.

[1]  M. Jackson.  Spreading the Word , 2015 .

[2]  Maximiliaan Schillebeeckx,et al.  The missing piece to changing the university culture , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Predicting Publication Success for Biologists , 2013 .

[4]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Meta‐analysis: A need for well‐defined usage in ecology and conservation biology , 2013 .

[5]  R. May,et al.  Can We Name Earth's Species Before They Go Extinct? , 2013, Science.

[6]  Marco Pautasso,et al.  Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability , 2012 .

[7]  D. Hoekman,et al.  Integrating Theoretical Components: A Graphical Model for Graduate Students and Researchers , 2012 .

[8]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel , 2012, Oecologia.

[9]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Framework to improve the application of theory in ecology and conservation , 2012 .

[10]  Brett R. Scheffers,et al.  Conserving imperiled species: a comparison of the IUCN Red List and U.S. Endangered Species Act , 2012 .

[11]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Resolving current disagreements and ambiguities in the terminology of animal communication , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[12]  Markus Wrobel,et al.  Classifying knowledge on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability in Europe for informing adaptation research and decision-making: A conceptual meta-analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  I. MacGregor‐Fors.  Misconceptions or misunderstandings? On the standardization of basic terms and definitions in urban ecology , 2011 .

[15]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology , 2011, Science.

[16]  S. Scheiner,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Biology , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  P. Ehrlich.  Cultural evolution and the human predicament. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  Creating a Common Climate Language , 2009, Science.

[19]  J. Morrone,et al.  International Code of Area Nomenclature , 2008 .

[20]  Jean-Claude Dauvin,et al.  The need for clear and comparable terminology in benthic ecology. Part I. Ecological concepts , 2008 .

[21]  J. Dauvin,et al.  The need for clear and comparable terminology in benthic ecology. Part II. Application of the European Directives , 2008 .

[22]  Kurt Jax,et al.  Concepts, not terms , 2008 .

[23]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  Advancing ecological research with ontologies. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  K. E. Hodges,et al.  Defining the problem: terminology and progress in ecology , 2008 .

[25]  Joern Fischer,et al.  Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  The New Bioinformatics: Integrating Ecological Data from the Gene to the Biosphere , 2006 .

[27]  M. Kearney,et al.  Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modelling? , 2006 .

[28]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  Contemporary Visions of Progress in Ecology and Thoughts for the Future , 2004 .

[29]  G. Belovsky,et al.  Ten Suggestions to Strengthen the Science of Ecology , 2004 .

[30]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  A TAXONOMY AND TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY FOR ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2002 .

[31]  J. R. Weber,et al.  The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak? , 2001 .

[32]  A. Middleton,et al.  What does ‘fledging’ mean? , 2001 .

[33]  R. May.  Unanswered questions in ecology. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  P. Raven,et al.  Ecological Science and the Human Predicament , 1998, Science.

[35]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  An "audience effect" for ecological terminology: use and misuse of jargon , 1997 .

[36]  W. Michael Kemp,et al.  The ecosystem approach: Its use and abuse : Gene E. Likens. Excellence in Ecology, Vol. 3, Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany, 1992, 166 pp., US $33.50, DM 59.00, ISSN 0932 2205 , 1995 .

[37]  James H. Cowan,et al.  The ecosystem approach: Its use and abuse , 1993 .

[38]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation , 1993 .

[39]  Lawrence B. Slobodkin,et al.  A Critique for Ecology , 1991 .

[40]  J. M. Fryxell.  COPING WITH UNCERTAINTY IN WILDLIFE BIOLOGY , 1991 .

[41]  S. Pimm.  The complexity and stability of ecosystems , 1984, Nature.

[42]  R. Whittaker.  Two Ecological Glossaries and a Proposal on Nomenclature , 1957, Ecology.

[43]  W. G.McGinnies,et al.  Program: The Meeting of the Society at Pasadena, California June 16, 17, 18, 19, 1931 , 1931, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

[44]  A. S. Hitchcock.  REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON NOMENCLATURE OF THE BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. , 1921, Science.