Computerized detection of leukocytes in microscopic leukorrhea images

Purpose Detection of leukocytes is critical for the routine leukorrhea exam, which is widely used in gynecological examinations. An elevated vaginal leukocyte count in women with bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of vaginal or cervical infections. In the routine leukorrhea exam, the counting of leukocytes is primarily performed by manual techniques. However, the viewing and counting of leukocytes from multiple high‐power viewing fields on a glass slide under a microscope leads to subjectivity, low efficiency, and low accuracy. To date, many biological cells in stool, blood, and breast cancer have been studied to realize computerized detection; however, the detection of leukocytes in microscopic leukorrhea images has not been studied. Thus, there is an increasing need for computerized detection of leukocytes. Methods There are two key processes in the computerized detection of leukocytes in digital image processing. One is segmentation; the other is intelligent classification. In this paper, we propose a combined ensemble to detect leukocytes in the microscopic leukorrhea image. After image segmentation and selecting likely leukocyte subimages, we obtain the leukocyte candidates. Then, for intelligent classification, we adopt two methods: feature extraction and classification by a support vector machine (SVM); applying a modified convolutional neural network (CNN) to the larger subimages. If different methods classify a candidate in the same category, the process is finished. If not, the outputs of the methods are provided to a classifier to further classify the candidate. Results After acquiring leukocyte candidates, we attempted three methods to perform classification. The first approach using features and SVM achieved 88% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 92.5% accuracy. The second method using CNN achieved 95% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 89.5% accuracy. Then, in the combination approach, we achieved 92% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and 93.5% accuracy. Finally, the images with marked and counted leukocytes were obtained. Conclusion A novel computerized detection system was developed for automated detection of leukocytes in microscopic images. Different methods resulted in comparable overall qualities by enabling computerized detection of leukocytes. The proposed approach further improved the performance. This preliminary study proves the feasibility of computerized detection of leukocytes in clinical use.

[1]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[2]  Song Liu,et al.  Features for cells and nuclei classification , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  J. Schwebke,et al.  Vaginal leucocyte counts in women with bacterial vaginosis: relation to vaginal and cervical infections , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[4]  Flávio H. D. Araújo,et al.  Unsupervised Leukemia Cells Segmentation Based on Multi-space Color Channels , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM).

[5]  Mita Nasipuri,et al.  Blood smear analyzer for white blood cell counting: A hybrid microscopic image analyzing technique , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Lalit Mohan Saini,et al.  Counting and classification of white blood cell using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) , 2016, 2016 IEEE 1st International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES).

[7]  V. Piuri,et al.  Morphological classification of blood leucocytes by microscope images , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference onComputational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications, 2004. CIMSA..

[8]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[9]  Priyanka Singh,et al.  Automatic classification of leukocytes using morphological features and Naïve Bayes classifier , 2016, 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON).

[10]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  WestonJason,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002 .

[12]  Meng Wang,et al.  Novel cell segmentation and online SVM for cell cycle phase identification in automated microscopy , 2008, Bioinform..

[13]  Fatos T. Yarman-Vural,et al.  BAS: a perceptual shape descriptor based on the beam angle statistics , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Pagavathigounder Balasubramaniam,et al.  A new thresholding technique based on fuzzy set as an application to leukocyte nucleus segmentation , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[15]  R. Keys Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing , 1981 .

[16]  Malcolm I. Heywood,et al.  Reconfigurable computing implementation of binary morphological operators using 4-, 6- and 8-connectivity , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[17]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) for Nuclei Detection on Breast Cancer Histopathology Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Aixia Guo,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2014 .

[19]  Balza Achmad,et al.  Classification of leukocyte images using K-Means Clustering based on geometry features , 2016, 2016 6th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES).

[20]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[21]  Yong Liu,et al.  Automatic identification of fungi under complex microscopic fecal images , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[22]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[23]  R A Kirsch,et al.  Computer determination of the constituent structure of biological images. , 1971, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[24]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.