Program Monitoring Practices for Teachers of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Early Intervention

Program monitoring is an important and necessary assessment practice within the field of early childhood deaf education. Effective program monitoring requires a focus on both the consistent implementation of intervention strategies (fidelity) and the assessment of children’s ongoing progress in response to interventions (progress monitoring). Teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing (TODs) who provide early intervention services need to conduct regular program monitoring to evaluate the merit of their efforts. However, progress monitoring is a practice often overlooked by practitioners within the field of early intervention. It is recommended that TODs monitor children’s progress “regularly,” but evidence of such practices by TODs is as yet unavailable. In this article, we describe how TODs can use both progress monitoring and fidelity checks to achieve the goal of effective program monitoring for young children who are deaf and hard of hearing.

[1]  John William McKenna,et al.  Measuring Fidelity to Improve Intervention Effectiveness , 2014 .

[2]  R. Landa,et al.  The Early Motor Questionnaire (EMQ): a parental report measure of early motor development. , 2013, Infant behavior & development.

[3]  Rashida Banerjee,et al.  Assessment Practices and Training Needs of Early Childhood Professionals , 2013 .

[4]  Erin E. Barton,et al.  Guidelines for Graphing Data With Microsoft® Office 2007™, Office 2010™, and Office for Mac™ 2008 and 2011 , 2012 .

[5]  Juliann Woods,et al.  Using Routines-Based Interventions in Early Childhood Special Education. , 2012 .

[6]  C. Greenwood,et al.  Advances in Measurement for Universal Screening and Individual Progress Monitoring of Young Children , 2011 .

[7]  Jay Buzhardt,et al.  A Web-Based Tool to Support Data-Based Early Intervention Decision Making , 2010 .

[8]  Karen L. Gischlar,et al.  Improving Child Outcomes With Data-Based Decision Making: Collecting Data , 2009 .

[9]  Andrew T. Roach,et al.  Assessment in Early Childhood , 2008 .

[10]  C. Greenwood,et al.  The Use of Individual Growth and Developmental Indicators for Progress Monitoring and Intervention Decision Making in Early Education , 2008 .

[11]  S. Baird,et al.  On the Same Page: Seeking Fidelity of Intervention , 2007 .

[12]  M. Hyson,et al.  Promoting Positive Outcomes for Children with Disabilities: Recommendations for Curriculum, Assessment, and Program Evaluation. , 2007 .

[13]  Kim Van Naarden Braun,et al.  Prevalence of four developmental disabilities among children aged 8 years--Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 1996 and 2000. , 2006, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[14]  Susan R. Sandall,et al.  DEC Recommended Practices : A Comprehensive Guide for Practical Application in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education , 2005 .

[15]  I. Schwartz,et al.  Interventionists' Perspectives about Data Collection in Integrated Early Childhood Classrooms , 2004 .

[16]  G. Luze,et al.  Improving Outcomes for Young Children by Assessing Intervention Integrity and Monitoring Progress , 2004 .

[17]  A. M. Tharpe Beyond newborn hearing screening: The critical first few months , 2002 .

[18]  C. Dunst,et al.  Natural Learning Opportunities for Infants, Toddlers, and Preschoolers , 2001 .

[19]  F. Gresham,et al.  Treatment Integrity in Learning Disabilities Intervention Research: Do We Really Know How Treatments Are Implemented? , 2000 .

[20]  Susan R. Sandall,et al.  Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education , 2000 .

[21]  S. McConnell Assessment in Early Intervention and Early Childhood Special Education , 2000 .

[22]  R. McWilliam Family-Centered Intervention Planning: A Routines-Based Approach. , 1992 .