Perception of structure in short melodic sequences.

Three experiments studied the perception of tone sequences having various degrees of musical structure. Ratings of perceived structure and ease of recognition in transposition were both influenced by harmonic progression (as defined by music theory), the contour (directional changes in pitch), and the excursion or repetition pattern within the sequence. The relation between the original and transposed sequence also affected ease of recognition in accordance with the number of tones shared between the two sequences. The results are described in terms of the abstraction and analysis of levels of pitch relations, an analysis conducted even by musically untrained listeners. The conceptual framework emphasizes the application of musical rules as an illustration of rules governing auditory sequences in general.

[1]  Annabel J. Cohen,et al.  Recognition of Transposed Melodic Sequences , 1976 .

[2]  E. Boring.  Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[3]  F. Attneave,et al.  Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Recognition memory for single tones with and without context. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[5]  Frank Restle,et al.  Theory of Serial Pattern Learning: Structural Trees. , 1970 .

[6]  R. Shepard,et al.  Quantification of the Hierarchy of Tonal Functions Within a Diatonic Context , 1979 .

[7]  W. Jay Dowling,et al.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Graham George,et al.  Tonality and Musical Structure , 1970 .

[9]  W. Dowling.  Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. , 1978 .

[10]  D Deutsch,et al.  Effect of repetition of standard and comparison tones on recognition memory for pitch. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Marc Leman,et al.  Music, memory, and thought , 1977 .

[12]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  AUDITORY PATTERNS: STUDIES IN THE PERCEPTION OF STRUCTURE , 1978 .

[13]  Leonard Bernstein.  The infinite variety of music , 1966 .

[14]  Diana Deutsch,et al.  Memory and Attention in Music , 1977 .

[15]  Leonard B. Meyer.  Emotion and Meaning in Music , 1957 .

[16]  W. Dowling,et al.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Leslie Bassett,et al.  Form in Tonal Music , 1965 .

[18]  L. Cuddy,et al.  Melody recognition: the experimental application of musical rules. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychology.

[19]  Lola L. Cuddy,et al.  Training the absolute identification of pitch , 1970 .

[20]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. , 1963 .

[21]  R. Francès.  La perception de la musique , 1958 .

[22]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[23]  Paul C. Vitz,et al.  A coded element model of the perceptual processing of sequential stimuli. , 1969 .

[24]  H. Helmholtz,et al.  On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music , 2005 .

[25]  L L Cuddy,et al.  Absolute judgment of musically-related pure tones. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.

[26]  W. R. Garner.  Good patterns have few alternatives. , 1970, American scientist.

[27]  F. Restle,et al.  Coding of nonsense vs the detection of patterns , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[28]  H. Helmholtz,et al.  Book Reviews: On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music , 1954 .

[29]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Relation of Pitch to Frequency: A Revised Scale , 1940 .