Visco-elastic Parameters of Dental Restorative Materials during Setting

Contraction stresses generated in restoratives during setting are among the major problems in adhesive dentistry, since they often result in loss of adhesion from the cavity walls or in post-operative pain. The rate of stress development and the ultimate magnitude of the stress, which determine the seriousness of these problems, depend on the relatively unknown visco-elastic behavior of the restoratives during setting. The aim of this study was to determine the visco-elastic parameters during setting, to aid our understanding of the process of contraction stress development. A dynamic mechanical method was used in which the materials were subjected to periodic strain cycles in a universal testing machine during the first 60 min of setting. The visco-elastic parameters (viscosity η and Young's modulus E) were calculated by analysis of the experimental stress-strain data with a simple mechanical model according to Maxwell. Two restorative materials from different classes were investigated: a two-paste resin composite and a conventional glass-ionomer cement. A comparison of the results showed significant differences in the development of viscosity and stiffness in the early stage of setting. The resultant relaxation time (η/E) of the glass ionomer remained at a low level during the first 15 min, whereas that of the resin composite increased markedly. This is of clinical importance, since it implies that, during the early setting stage, glass ionomers are better capable of reducing the contraction stresses than resin composites, thus increasing the likelihood that the bond with the cavity walls will form and survive during setting.

[1]  M. Swain,et al.  A comparison of the mechanical properties of three glass-ionomer cements. , 1994, Dental materials journal.

[2]  R. Bowen,et al.  Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening. , 1983, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  M. Sankarapandian,et al.  Influence of resin molecular structure on the processibility and physical behavior of a dental composite matrix , 1996 .

[4]  A. Feilzer,et al.  True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  C. Davidson,et al.  The Competition between the Composite-Dentin Bond Strength and the Polymerization Contraction Stress , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[6]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Stiffness Increase During the Setting of Dental Composite Resins , 1987, Journal of dentistry research.

[7]  I Krejci,et al.  Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. , 1986, Quintessence international.

[8]  C. Davidson,et al.  Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  J. Katz,et al.  Elastic Properties of Dental Resin Restorative Materials , 1974, Journal of dental research.

[10]  R. Pidaparti,et al.  Elastic and fracture properties of dental direct filling materials. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[11]  R. G. C. Arridge,et al.  Mechanics of polymers , 1975 .

[12]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Enamel damages caused by contracting restorative resins. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[13]  J. Ferry Viscoelastic properties of polymers , 1961 .

[14]  N. Gjerdet,et al.  Contraction stresses of composite resin filling materials. , 1977, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[15]  Crim Ga Microleakage of three resin placement techniques. , 1991 .

[16]  H. Shimokobe,et al.  [Composite resin restorations in posterior teeth]. , 1983, Shikai tenbo = Dental outlook.

[17]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[18]  J. Rees,et al.  The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. , 1989, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  D. Watts,et al.  Ultrasonic Evaluation of Anterior Restorative Materials , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[20]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  The Impact of Composite Structure on Its Elastic Response , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[21]  C. Davidson,et al.  Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[23]  C. Davidson,et al.  Tensile Strength of Thin Resin Composite Layers as a Function of Layer Thickness , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[24]  R. Lakes,et al.  Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[25]  P. H. Jacobsen,et al.  Finite element analysis of dental polymeric restorations , 1991 .

[26]  P. Jacobsen,et al.  Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Resin-based Filling Materials , 1980, Journal of dental research.