Defining “Complications” in Spine Surgery: Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Spine Surgeons' Survey

Study Design Survey of neurosurgical and orthopedic spine surgeons. Objective To define the “complications of spinal surgery,” we surveyed a large group of practicing spine surgeons to establish a preliminary definition of perioperative complications. Summary of Background Data Although the risk of complications following spinal procedures plays an important role in determining the appropriateness of surgical intervention, there is little consensus among spine surgeons regarding the definition of complications in spine surgery. The relevance of medical complications is also not clearly defined. Methods We surveyed a cohort of practicing spine surgeons via email and a commercially maintained website. Surgeons were presented with various complication scenarios, and asked to assess the presence or absence of a complication, as well as complication severity, with responses limited to “major complication” and “minor complication/adverse event.” Results The survey was sent to approximately 2000 practicing surgeons; complete responses were received from 229, giving a response rate of 11.4%. Orthopedic surgeons comprised the majority of respondents (73%); most surgeons reported being in practice for greater than 5 years (83%). Greater than 75% of surgeons agreed on complication presence or absence in 10 of 11 scenarios assessed (91%, P<0.05). Consensus (≥70% agreement, P<0.05) as to type of complication was found in 7 of 11 scenarios presented (64%). Events deemed major complications involved either severe medical adverse events with permanent sequela or events requiring return to the operating room. Surgeons consistently considered medical adverse events, whether or not directly related to surgery, relevant to complication assessment. Conclusions We present a practical binary definition of complications in spine surgery based upon a survey of over 200 practicing spine surgeons. Further work is required in critically assessing spine surgery complications.

[1]  R. Pietrobon,et al.  Geographic variation in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders: 1990 to 2000. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  A. Sharan,et al.  Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  Alan H. Daniels,et al.  Variability in rates of arthrodesis procedures for patients with cervical spine injuries with and without associated spinal cord injury. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  James N Weinstein,et al.  United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003 , 2006, Spine.

[5]  Tom Stanley,et al.  Instrumentation-Related Complications of Multilevel Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Over Age 65: Surgical Considerations and Treatment Options in Patients With Poor Bone Quality , 2006, Spine.

[6]  T. Albert,et al.  Medical Complications of Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity and How to Avoid Them , 2006, Spine.

[7]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  M. A. Neary,et al.  Intraoperative Adverse Events and Related Postoperative Complications in Spine Surgery: Implications for Enhancing Patient Safety Founded on Evidence-Based Protocols , 2006, Spine.

[9]  K. O'Connor,et al.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. , 2005, Health services research.

[10]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[11]  Warren D. Yu,et al.  Perioperative Complications of Threaded Cylindrical Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: Anterior Versus Posterior Approach , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[12]  M. Partin,et al.  The impact of survey nonresponse bias on conclusions drawn from a mammography intervention trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  J. Ormel,et al.  Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[14]  D. Balzi,et al.  Nine-year follow-up of a survey on smoking habits in Florence (Italy): higher mortality among non-responders. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[15]  Roger L. Brown,et al.  Nonresponse Bias: Does It Affect Measurement of Clinician Behavior? , 2002, Medical care.

[16]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[17]  T. Stitik.  Spine Surgery: Techniques, Complication Avoidance, and Management , 1999 .

[18]  J. Kostuik,et al.  Complications of spinal fusion in adult patients more than 60 years of age. , 1998, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[19]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  M. T. Forthman,et al.  Risk‐Adjusted Quality Outcome Measures: Indexes for Benchmarking Rates of Mortality, Complications, and Readmissions , 1997, Quality management in health care.

[21]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Perioperative Complications of Anterior Procedures on the Spine*† , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  J. Sanabria,et al.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. , 1992, Surgery.

[23]  D. Locker,et al.  Response trends and nonresponse bias in a mail survey of oral and facial pain. , 1988, Journal of public health dentistry.

[24]  F. Speizer,et al.  Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed questionnaire. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[25]  E. Hovland,et al.  Nonresponse bias to mail survey questionnaires within a professional population. , 1980, Journal of dental education.

[26]  J. Hassi,et al.  Does non-responder bias have a significant effect on the results in a postal questionnaire study? , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[27]  S. Thomsen.  An examination of nonresponse in a work environment questionnaire mailed to psychiatric health care personnel. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[28]  K. Sheehan.  Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration , 1999 .

[29]  J. Koval,et al.  Nonresponse bias in a survey of Ontario dentists' infection control and attitudes concerning HIV. , 1997, Journal of public health dentistry.

[30]  L. Melton,et al.  Differences in the characteristics of responders and non-responders in a prevalence survey of vertebral osteoporosis. , 1996, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.