Function of pipistrelle social calls: field data and a playback experiment

Abstract The study aimed to determine whether the so-called social calls that are produced by foraging bats of two phonic types of Pipistrellus pipistrellus serve a social function. First, the relationship between insect availability and the rate of production of social calls was measured at a foraging site of both phonic types. Second, playback experiments of social calls of the two phonic types were conducted in the field to determine the response of foraging bats to these calls, and to determine whether the calls are used in communication within or between phonic types. Two hypotheses are suggested for the function of social calls: that they may be used either to attract other bats to a food patch, or in agonistic interactions between bats in defence of a food patch. At relatively low insect densities, the rate of social call production of both phonic types increased significantly as insect density decreased. When social calls of each phonic type were broadcast, there was a significant reduction in bat activity of the same phonic type. In contrast, playbacks of social calls resulted in no change in activity of the other phonic type. The results supported the food patch defence hypothesis, that social calls are used to warn off other bats of the same phonic type when insects are scarce. The results also supported the hypothesis that the two phonic types are sibling species. Social calls were shown to serve a social function in intraspecific communication, but there was no communication between phonic types. 1997 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

[1]  P. Racey,et al.  Feeding ecology of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during pregnancy and lactation. I. Foraging behaviour , 1985 .

[2]  Bernice W. Polemis.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[3]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[4]  Peter E. Zingg.  Akustische Artidentifikation von Fledermäusen (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in der Schweiz , 1990 .

[5]  M. Brock Fenton,et al.  A technique for monitoring bat activity with results obtained from different environments in southern Ontario , 1970 .

[6]  N. Vaughan.  The diets of British bats (Chiroptera) , 1997 .

[7]  S. L. Sutton,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of flying Diptera , 1992 .

[8]  S. V. Van Parijs,et al.  Bimodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present? , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  R. Fay,et al.  Hearing by Bats , 1995, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[10]  John H. Kaufmann,et al.  ON THE DEFINITIONS AND FUNCTIONS OF DOMINANCE AND TERRITORIALITY , 1983 .

[11]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Signalling in Territorial Systems: A Context for Individual Identification, Ranging and Eavesdropping , 1993 .

[12]  Charles R. Brown,et al.  Food-sharing signals among socially foraging cliff swallows , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  L. Emmons,et al.  Social organization of some trinidad bats I. Emballonuridae. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[14]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Differences in songflight calls and social calls between two phonic types of the vespertilionid bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus , 1997 .

[15]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[16]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[17]  M. Brock Fenton,et al.  Assessing signal variability and reliability: 'to thine ownself be true' , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  J. Fullard,et al.  Echolocation and foraging behaviour in the Hawaiian hoary bat, Lasiurus cinereus semotus , 1984 .

[19]  D. Lott,et al.  Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Playback and Studies of Animal Communication , 1992, NATO ASI Series.

[21]  Gary F. McCracken,et al.  Communication in the Chiroptera, M. Brock Fenton. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1985), ix, +161. Price $35.00 , 1986 .

[22]  R. Brigham,et al.  Constraints on optimal foraging: a field test of prey discrimination by echolocating insectivorous hats , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  L. Taylor,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE SUCTION TRAPS FOR AIRBORNE INSECTS , 1955 .

[24]  J. Simmons,et al.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[26]  M. Fenton.  Natural History and Biosonar Signals , 1995 .

[27]  J. Rydell.  Site Fidelity in the Northern Bat (Eptesicus nilssoni) during Pregnancy and Lactation , 1989 .

[28]  E. Morton.  On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in Some Bird and Mammal Sounds , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[29]  R. Wayne,et al.  Characterization of mitochondrial DNA variability within the microchiropteran genus Pipistrellus: approaches and applications , 1995 .