DICHOTOMOUS-CHOICE, CONTINGENT-VALUATION QUESTIONS: FUNCTIONAL FORM IS IMPORTANT

A variety of questioning formats have been used in contingent-valuation studies, with dichotomous-choice questions becoming the preferred format. However, as with any empirical technique, continued applications raise questions that require attention if the credibility of the procedure is to be maintained. It is shown that estimated Hicksian surplus can be substantially affected by the selection of a functional form when analyzing responses to dichotomous-choice questions. Given that theory, intuition, and empiricism all play a role in developing these estimates, several maxims are suggested for evaluating and/or mitigating such effects in future studies.

[1]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions , 1973 .

[2]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[3]  T. Amemiya.  QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[4]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[5]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for wilderness. , 1983 .

[6]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[7]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[8]  V. Smith.  Some Issues In Discrete Response Contingent Valuation Studies , 1985 .

[9]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques , 1985 .

[10]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Estimating Environmental Benefits , 1986 .

[11]  R. Bishop,et al.  The Valuation Problem , 1986 .

[12]  R. C. Bishop,et al.  Assessing the validity of contingent valuation: Three field experiments , 1986 .

[13]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Travel Cost Demand Model as an Environmental Policy Assessment Tool: A Review of Literature , 1986 .

[14]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[15]  Alan Randall,et al.  A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation , 1987 .

[16]  M. Edward Rister,et al.  SELECTING FUNCTIONAL FORM IN PRODUCTION FUNCTION ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[17]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1987 .

[18]  J. Loomis.  Balancing public trust resources of Mono Lake and Los Angeles' Water Right: An economic approach , 1987 .

[19]  John R. Stoll,et al.  Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource , 1988 .

[20]  Michael P. Welsh,et al.  Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: Comment and Extension , 1988 .

[21]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques , 1988 .

[22]  J. Walter Milon,et al.  Contingent valuation experiments for strategic behavior , 1989 .

[23]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[24]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Comment , 1989 .