Sino-Canadian Collaborations in Stem Cell Research: A Scientometric Analysis

Background International collaboration (IC) is essential for the advance of stem cell research, a field characterized by marked asymmetries in knowledge and capacity between nations. China is emerging as a global leader in the stem cell field. However, knowledge on the extent and characteristics of IC in stem cell science, particularly China’s collaboration with developed economies, is lacking. Methods and Findings We provide a scientometric analysis of the China–Canada collaboration in stem cell research, placing this in the context of other leading producers in the field. We analyze stem cell research published from 2006 to 2010 from the Scopus database, using co-authored papers as a proxy for collaboration. We examine IC levels, collaboration preferences, scientific impact, the collaborating institutions in China and Canada, areas of mutual interest, and funding sources. Our analysis shows rapid global expansion of the field with 48% increase in papers from 2006 to 2010. China now ranks second globally after the United States. China has the lowest IC rate of countries examined, while Canada has one of the highest. China–Canada collaboration is rising steadily, more than doubling during 2006–2010. China–Canada collaboration enhances impact compared to papers authored solely by China-based researchers This difference remained significant even when comparing only papers published in English. Conclusions While China is increasingly courted in IC by developed countries as a partner in stem cell research, it is clear that it has reached its status in the field largely through domestic publications. Nevertheless, IC enhances the impact of stem cell research in China, and in the field in general. This study establishes an objective baseline for comparison with future studies, setting the stage for in-depth exploration of the dynamics and genesis of IC in stem cell research.

[1]  D. van der Kooy,et al.  Retinal stem cells in the adult mammalian eye. , 2000, Science.

[2]  A. Schnerch,et al.  Direct conversion of human fibroblasts to multilineage blood progenitors , 2010, Nature.

[3]  Ding-wei Huang,et al.  Correlation between impact and collaboration , 2011, Scientometrics.

[4]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration , 2004, Scientometrics.

[5]  B. Salter,et al.  China and the global stem cell bioeconomy: an emerging political strategy? , 2006, Regenerative medicine.

[6]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency , 2011, Nature.

[7]  Dawn Freshwater,et al.  International research collaboration , 2006 .

[8]  Olle Persson,et al.  The measurement of international scientific collaboration , 1993, Scientometrics.

[9]  Va Arlington National Science Board. , 2010 .

[10]  Elaine Howard Ecklund,et al.  International Stem Cell Collaboration: How Disparate Policies between the United States and the United Kingdom Impact Research , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Celebrating 10 years. , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  Xu Zhang,et al.  International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: a perspective from paper and patent analysis , 2011, Scientometrics.

[13]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Stem cell charter. , 2010, Regenerative medicine.

[14]  A. Daar,et al.  Regenerative medicine in Brazil: small but innovative. , 2010, Regenerative medicine.

[15]  Judy Illes,et al.  The Stem Cell Research Environment: A Patchwork of Patchworks , 2009, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[16]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[17]  Global Challenges in Stem Cell Research and the Many Roads Ahead , 2011, Neuron.

[18]  A. Daar,et al.  Harnessing stem cells for health needs in India. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[19]  Jesse M. Flynn,et al.  Stem Cell Research in the Greater Middle East: The Importance of Establishing Policy and Ethics Interoperability to Foster International Collaborations , 2010, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[20]  Juan Gorraiz,et al.  Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration: a case study for Austria and six countries , 2011, Scientometrics.

[21]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Stem cell research ethics: consensus statement on emerging issues. , 2007, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[22]  D. Sipp Stem cells and regenerative medicine on the Asian horizon: an economic, industry and social perspective. , 2009, Regenerative medicine.

[23]  Qi Zhou,et al.  Stem cell science on the rise in China. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[24]  J. R. Steelman Science and Public Policy , 1948 .

[25]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world , 2008, Scientometrics.

[26]  Grégoire Côté,et al.  Potential for Stem Cells Science and Technology in Canada : Great Promises and Challenges , 2004 .

[27]  Jakob Edler,et al.  Drivers of International collaboration in research , 2009 .

[28]  J. Till,et al.  A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. , 1961, Radiation research.

[29]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Across institutional boundaries?: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience , 2008 .

[30]  A. Sadikot,et al.  Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  H. Thorsteinsdóttir,et al.  Developing biomedical innovation capacity in India , 2011 .

[32]  P. Boekholt,et al.  Drivers of international collaboration in research. Report to European Commission, DG Research. Technopolis BV , 2009 .

[33]  P. Robertson,et al.  World investment report 2005: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D , 2007 .

[34]  Ove Kähler,et al.  Combining peer review and metrics to assess journals for inclusion in Scopus , 2010, Learn. Publ..

[35]  S. Weiss,et al.  Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. , 1992, Science.

[36]  Peter A Singer,et al.  Scientific Diasporas , 2006, Science.

[37]  P. Riggs Country report: China , 1992 .

[38]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[39]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  International Research Collaboration , 1979 .

[40]  Lei Wang,et al.  Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[41]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry , 2004, Scientometrics.

[42]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[43]  D. Sipp Stem cell research in Asia: A critical view , 2009, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[44]  Cultivating regenerative medicine innovation in China. , 2010, Regenerative medicine.

[45]  Olle Persson,et al.  Are highly cited papers more international? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[46]  H. Thorsteinsdóttir,et al.  Making stem cells count for global health. , 2011, Regenerative medicine.