Postoperative Outcomes and Patient's Satisfaction after Hybrid TIPP with UHS and TEP Repair for Inguinal Hernias: A Single-Centre Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background: Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) and Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repairs are largely acclaimed for their lower risk of chronic postoperative pain and acceptable recurrence rates. However, hybrid/combined open procedures are still a reliable option among surgeons. Our aim is to compare the outcomes and patients satisfaction of hybrid TIPP (hTIPP) procedure using the Ultrapro Hernia System with laparoscopic pre-peritoneal mesh repair approaches (TEP) to assess its safety and effectiveness. Patients and Methods: The study design is a single center, retrospective comparative study on 90 patients who had hTIPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair in the NAAS General Hospital, over a four-year period (2013-2017). Results: Unplanned postoperative hospital admission was comparable both groups, the figures were 3 patients for hTIPP and 3 patients for TEP. There was no statistically significant difference in the immediate, early and late postoperative pain and complications in both groups. The recurrence rate was nil in hTIPP group compared to one recurrent case in TEP. There is no statistical difference in the five outcomes of the PROM questionnaire and satisfaction rate between hTIPP and TEP. Conclusions: There is no significant difference between hTIPP and TEP in terms of postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. hTIPP approach is a safe and feasible alternative to TEP.

[1]  Naveen Kumar,et al.  Incidence of chronic pain after single stitch mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair: An observational prospective study, a case series , 2017 .

[2]  B. Stephenson,et al.  Groin hernia repair, surgeon volume, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). , 2016, Surgery.

[3]  M. Sajid,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Preperitoneal Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: an Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials , 2015, Indian Journal of Surgery.

[4]  E. Hokkam,et al.  Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: A randomized trial , 2015, Journal of minimal access surgery.

[5]  M. Özdoğan,et al.  ULTRAPRO Hernia System versus lichtenstein repair in treatment of primary inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized controlled study. , 2014, International surgery.

[6]  J. Appleby,et al.  Application of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data to estimate cost-effectiveness of hernia surgery in England , 2013, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[7]  M. Sajid,et al.  Open transinguinal preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a targeted systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials , 2013, Gastroenterology report.

[8]  Peter C Smith,et al.  On the uses of routine patient-reported health outcome data. , 2013, Health economics.

[9]  S. Panesar,et al.  Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: A meta-analysis of observational studies , 2012, Journal of minimal access surgery.

[10]  G. Tzovaras,et al.  Long-term results after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia , 2012, Hernia.

[11]  B. Gayet,et al.  Transinguinal Preperitoneal Patch (TIPP) under Local Anesthesia with Sedation , 2011, The American surgeon.

[12]  J. Rosenberg,et al.  Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. , 2011, Danish medical bulletin.

[13]  Y. Hamza,et al.  Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[14]  R. Troisi,et al.  Transinguinal preperitoneal memory ring patch versus Lichtenstein repair for unilateral inguinal hernias , 2010, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[15]  C. Leijonmarck,et al.  Short‐term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  D. Bhandarkar,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia: Current status and controversies , 2006, Journal of minimal access surgery.

[17]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention , 2006, The Lancet.

[18]  P. O’Dwyer,et al.  Laparoscopic or open preperitoneal repair in the management of recurrent groin hernias , 2006, Hernia.

[19]  A. Elfering,et al.  Pain assessment , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[20]  P. Vanclooster,et al.  The totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair , 1996, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  X. Feliu,et al.  Preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: Laparoscopic and open approach , 2004, Hernia.

[22]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Quality assessment of 26 304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study , 2001, The Lancet.

[23]  F. Perkins,et al.  Pain and Functional Impairment 1 Year After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: A Nationwide Questionnaire Study , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[24]  W. Voigt,et al.  Gilbert’s Repair of Inguinal Hernias , 2001 .

[25]  N. Black,et al.  Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review. , 1998, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[26]  G. Wantz Testicular atrophy and chronic residual neuralgia as risks of inguinal hernioplasty. , 1993, The Surgical clinics of North America.