Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. III. A self-interacting gene.

Living cells must control the reading out or "expression" of information encoded in their genomes, and this regulation often is mediated by transcription factors--proteins that bind to DNA and either enhance or repress the expression of nearby genes. But the expression of transcription factor proteins is itself regulated, and many transcription factors regulate their own expression in addition to responding to other input signals. Here we analyze the simplest of such self-regulatory circuits, asking how parameters can be chosen to optimize information transmission from inputs to outputs in the steady state. Some nonzero level of self-regulation is almost always optimal, with self-activation dominant when transcription factor concentrations are low and self-repression dominant when concentrations are high. In steady state the optimal self-activation is never strong enough to induce bistability, although there is a limit in which the optimal parameters are very close to the critical point.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  A. Hill,et al.  The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves , 1910 .

[3]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .

[5]  P. Steerenberg,et al.  Targeting pathophysiological rhythms: prednisone chronotherapy shows sustained efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[7]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[8]  William Bialek,et al.  Stability and Noise in Biochemical Switches , 2000, NIPS.

[9]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[10]  B. Séraphin,et al.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[11]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[13]  U. Alon,et al.  Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[15]  U. Alon,et al.  Assigning numbers to the arrows: Parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[17]  S. Leibler,et al.  DNA looping and physical constraints on transcription regulation. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[19]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[20]  P. Swain,et al.  Gene Regulation at the Single-Cell Level , 2005, Science.

[21]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation by the Numbers 2: Applications , 2004, q-bio/0412011.

[22]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  EcoCyc: a comprehensive database resource for Escherichia coli , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[25]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[26]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Noise Propagation in Gene Networks , 2005, Science.

[27]  W. Bialek,et al.  Physical limits to biochemical signaling. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Optimal Signal Processing in Small Stochastic Biochemical Networks , 2006, PloS one.

[29]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[30]  W. Bialek,et al.  The Role of Input Noise in Transcriptional Regulation , 2006, PloS one.

[31]  W. Bialek,et al.  Information flow and optimization in transcriptional regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  D. Larson,et al.  Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[33]  Gasper Tkacik,et al.  Information capacity of genetic regulatory elements. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  J. Vilar,et al.  Protein-protein/DNA interaction networks: versatile macromolecular structures for the control of gene expression. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[35]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Role of spatial averaging in the precision of gene expression patterns. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[36]  Gasper Tkacik,et al.  Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  W. Bialek,et al.  Diffusion, dimensionality, and noise in transcriptional regulation. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  C. Gardiner Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences , 2009 .

[39]  L. Mirny,et al.  Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  W. Bialek,et al.  Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. II. Feed-forward interactions. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Text S 1 : supplementary information for Combinatorial gene regulation using autoregulation , 2010 .

[42]  F. Tostevin,et al.  Effect of feedback on the fidelity of information transmission of time-varying signals. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  R. Segev,et al.  GENERAL PROPERTIES OF THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL TIME-SERIES IN ESCHERICHIA COLI , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[44]  D. Michel,et al.  A dynamic model of transcriptional imprinting derived from the vitellogenesis memory effect. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[45]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Effect of Promoter Architecture on the Cell-to-Cell Variability in Gene Expression , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  J. Vilar,et al.  Control of gene expression by modulated self-assembly , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  Aleksandra M Walczak,et al.  Information transmission in genetic regulatory networks: a review , 2011, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[48]  Owen P. Leary,et al.  40: PATIENT-SPECIFIC PROGNOSTICATION AFTER TBI IS RELATED TO BLEED PHENOTYPE AND ANATOMIC LOCATION , 2006, Testament d'un patriote exécuté.

[49]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .