Activity intensity, assistive devices and joint replacement influence predicted remodelling in the proximal femur

Bone morphology and density changes are commonly observed following joint replacement, may contribute to the risks of implant loosening and periprosthetic fracture and reduce the available bone stock for revision surgery. This study was presented in the ‘Bone and Cartilage Mechanobiology across the scales’ WCCM symposium to review the development of remodelling prediction methods and to demonstrate simulation of adaptive bone remodelling around hip replacement femoral components, incorporating intrinsic (prosthesis) and extrinsic (activity and loading) factors. An iterative bone remodelling process was applied to finite element models of a femur implanted with a cementless total hip replacement (THR) and a hip resurfacing implant. Previously developed for a cemented THR implant, this modified process enabled the influence of pre- to post-operative changes in patient activity and joint loading to be evaluated. A control algorithm used identical pre- and post-operative conditions, and the predicted extents and temporal trends of remodelling were measured by generating virtual X-rays and DXA scans. The modified process improved qualitative and quantitative remodelling predictions for both the cementless THR and resurfacing implants, but demonstrated the sensitivity to DXA scan region definition and appropriate implant–bone position and sizing. Predicted remodelling in the intact femur in response to changed activity and loading demonstrated that in this simplified model, although the influence of the extrinsic effects were important, the mechanics of implantation were dominant. This study supports the application of predictive bone remodelling as one element in the range of physical and computational studies, which should be conducted in the preclinical evaluation of new prostheses.

[1]  N. Nuño,et al.  Bone remodeling in the resurfaced femoral head: effect of cement mantle thickness and interface characteristics. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  Massimo Sartori,et al.  Bone remodelling in the natural acetabulum is influenced by muscle force‐induced bone stress , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[4]  P. Chandran,et al.  Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling after 12 Years Differs in Cemented and Uncemented Hip Arthroplasties , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  M. Harris-Hayes,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or less: do we improve activity profiles? , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Implant–bone interface healing and adaptation in resurfacing hip replacement , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[8]  D. Murray,et al.  The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty AN INDEPENDENT , 2008 .

[9]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Martin Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[11]  J. V. Van Susante,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density and femoral neck narrowing in the proximal femur three to five years after hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  S. Singh,et al.  Hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stems in young patients. A prospective ten-year study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  M Doblaré,et al.  Application of an anisotropic bone-remodelling model based on a damage-repair theory to the analysis of the proximal femur before and after total hip replacement. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  K. Mukherjee,et al.  Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  F Kainberger,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  C. Engh,et al.  Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  S. Gupta,et al.  A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: Effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[19]  P. Fernandes,et al.  Femoral neck bone adaptation to weight-bearing physical activity by computational analysis. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  R. Meek,et al.  Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  The effect of adaptive bone remodeling threshold levels on resorption around noncemented hip stems. , 1991 .

[23]  Toward a method to simulate the process of bone ingrowth in cementless THA using finite element method. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  H B Skinner,et al.  Correlation of Computed Finite Element Stresses to Bone Density After Remodeling Around Cementless Femoral Implants , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  R. Eastell,et al.  Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  Luis Gracia,et al.  Long-term study of bone remodelling after femoral stem: a comparison between dexa and finite element simulation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Balancing incompatible endoprosthetic design goals: a combined ingrowth and bone remodeling simulation. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  N. Rushton,et al.  Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  T Nishii,et al.  Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  A. Dickinson Activity and loading influence the predicted bone remodeling around cemented hip replacements. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  J. Galante,et al.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  I. Stockley,et al.  Effect of sliding-taper compared with composite-beam cemented femoral prosthesis loading regime on proximal femoral bone remodeling: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  Hung-Wen Wei,et al.  Difference in femoral head and neck material properties between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[34]  R A Brand,et al.  The effect of cane use on hip contact force. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[36]  Patrick J Prendergast,et al.  Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[37]  Zong-ke Zhou,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[38]  Alexander Dickinson,et al.  Development of computational biomechanical tools to assess the performance of the resurfaced hip joint , 2011 .

[39]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  D J Beard,et al.  The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[41]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  M. Lavigne,et al.  Anisotropic bone remodeling of a biomimetic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implant. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[43]  M Doblaré,et al.  An Anisotropic Internal-External Bone Adaptation Model Based on a Combination of CAO and Continuum Damage Mechanics Technologies , 2001, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[44]  N. Sandiford,et al.  Primary total hip replacement with a Furlong fully hydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloy femoral component: Results at a minimum follow-up of 20 years. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[45]  A. Herrera,et al.  Mid-term study of bone remodeling after femoral cemented stem implantation: comparison between DXA and finite element simulation. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[46]  C. Heisel,et al.  Patient Activity after Total Hip Arthroplasty Declines with Advancing Age , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[47]  H. Bussmann,et al.  Small Increase of Actual Physical Activity 6 Months After Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[48]  J. Howard,et al.  Cementless Total HIP Replacements in Sickle Cell Disease , 2016, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[49]  R. Zernicke,et al.  Cane-assisted gait biomechanics and electromyography after total hip arthroplasty. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[50]  M. Clauss,et al.  Long-term femoral bone remodeling after cemented hip arthroplasty with the Müller straight stem in the operated and nonoperated femora. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[51]  Masao Tanaka,et al.  Simulation of Trabecular Surface Remodeling based on Local Stress Nonuniformity. , 1997 .

[52]  Natalia Nuño,et al.  A new interface element with progressive damage and osseointegration for modeling of interfaces in hip resurfacing , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[53]  R. Slack,et al.  15-Year Follow-up Results of the Hydroxyapatite Ceramic—Coated Femoral Stem , 2006, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.

[54]  V. Pineau,et al.  Cemented total hip stem design influence on adaptative cortical thickness and femoral morphology. , 2010, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[55]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[56]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[57]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[58]  M. T. Bah,et al.  Efficient computational method for assessing the effects of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[59]  M. Morlock,et al.  Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[60]  M. Bonnin,et al.  Do We Medialise the Hip Centre of Rotation in Total Hip Arthroplasty? Influence of Acetabular Offset and Surgical Technique , 2012, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[61]  A. Amis,et al.  The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[62]  J. Varmarken,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum, femoral neck and femoral shaft, after hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: two-year results from a randomised study. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[63]  Y.H. Kim,et al.  Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: alumina-on-alumina versus alumina-on-polyethylene articulation. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[64]  F. Pei,et al.  Changes of the bone mineral density in proximal femur following total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of femoral head , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[65]  W R Walsh,et al.  Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[66]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[67]  A. Amis,et al.  Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[68]  In Gwun Jang,et al.  Computational simulation of simultaneous cortical and trabecular bone change in human proximal femur during bone remodeling. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[69]  U. Leichtle,et al.  Peri-prosthetic bone density after implantation of a custom-made femoral component. A five-year follow-up. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[70]  H. Amstutz,et al.  Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[71]  M Honl,et al.  Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[72]  Cemented total hip stem design influence on adaptative cortical thickness and femoral morphology. , 2010 .

[73]  B. Stulberg,et al.  Early return to function after hip resurfacing: is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty? , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[74]  G Bergmann,et al.  Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[75]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[76]  M. Tarala,et al.  Improving peri-prosthetic bone adaptation around cementless hip stems: a clinical and finite element study. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[77]  D. Back,et al.  Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[78]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Metal on Metal Surface Replacement of the Hip: Experience of the McMinn Prosthesis , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[79]  C. Hing,et al.  Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[80]  Christopher Boyle,et al.  Comparison of different hip prosthesis shapes considering micro-level bone remodeling and stress-shielding criteria using three-dimensional design space topology optimization. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[81]  C. D. Della Valle,et al.  The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[82]  I. Jonkers,et al.  Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[83]  S J Eastaugh-Waring,et al.  Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.