Distribution network costs under different penetration levels of distributed generation

Nowadays, the amount of distributed generation (DG) connected to distribution networks is increasing significantly. In a European context, one of the main drivers for this growth is the support of electricity generation from renewable energy sources (RES) and combined heat and power (CHP) plants. Hence, these DG units mostly consist of non-controllable generation. Distribution is a regulated activity which is, at least, legally and functionally unbundled from the generation activity. These issues, together with the fact that distribution networks were not originally designed to accommodate generation, pose significant challenges on distribution network planning and operation. One of the major concerns of distribution system operators (DSOs) is the impact that large penetration levels of DG may have on distribution network costs. This paper presents a quantification of the impact of DG on distribution network costs in three real distribution areas. Different scenarios of demand and generation have been analysed for each region. Two possible situations are taken into account in each scenario: maximum net demand and maximum net generation. The computation of the distribution network costs was carried out by means of two large-scale distribution planning models called reference network models (RNMs). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  G. Joós,et al.  On the Quantification of the Network Capacity Deferral Value of Distributed Generation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  M.M.A. Salama,et al.  An integrated distributed generation optimization model for distribution system planning , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues , 2005 .

[4]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Distributed generation : a definition , 2001 .

[5]  Roger C. Dugan,et al.  Planning for distributed generation , 2001 .

[6]  H. Rudnick,et al.  Large-Scale Distribution Planning—Part I: Simultaneous Network and Transformer Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Hugh Rudnick,et al.  Economically adapted transmission systems in open access schemes-application of genetic algorithms , 1996 .

[8]  Rafael Cossent,et al.  Towards a future with large penetration of distributed generation: Is the current regulation of electricity distribution ready? Regulatory recommendations under a European perspective , 2009 .

[9]  G. Joós,et al.  Models for Quantifying the Economic Benefits of Distributed Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Tomás Gómez,et al.  Impact of distributed generation on distribution investment deferral , 2006 .

[11]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Reference models and incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks : An evaluation of Sweden's Network Performance Assessment Model (NPAM) , 2008 .

[12]  L.A. Kojovic,et al.  Summary of Distributed Resources Impact on Power Delivery Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  G. Strbac,et al.  Assessment of performance-driven investment strategies of distribution systems using reference networks , 2005 .

[14]  A. Munoz,et al.  Regulation of distribution network business , 1999 .

[15]  R. Ramakumar,et al.  An approach to quantify the technical benefits of distributed generation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[16]  J.R. Abbad,et al.  Assessment of energy distribution losses for increasing penetration of distributed generation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  H. Rudnick,et al.  Large-Scale Distribution Planning—Part II: Macro-Optimization With Voronoi's Diagram And Tabu Search , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Ralph Turvey On network efficiency comparisons: Electricity distribution , 2006 .