Configural specificity of the lateral occipital cortex

While regions of the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) are known to be selective for objects relative to feature-matched controls, it is not known what set of cues or configurations are used to promote this selectivity. Many theories of perceptual organization have emphasized the figure-ground relationship as being especially important in object-level processing. In the present work we studied the role of perceptual organization in eliciting visual evoked potentials from the object selective LOC. To do this, we used two-region stimuli in which the regions were modulated at different temporal frequencies and were comprised of either symmetric or asymmetric arrangements. The asymmetric arrangement produced an unambiguous figure-ground relationship consistent with a smaller figure region surrounded by a larger background, while four different symmetric arrangements resulted in ambiguous figure-ground relationships but still possessed strong kinetic boundaries between the regions. The surrounded figure-ground arrangement evoked greater activity in the LOC relative to first-tier visual areas (V1-V3). Response selectivity in the LOC, however, was not present for the four different types of symmetric stimuli. These results suggest that kinetic texture boundaries alone are not sufficient to trigger selective processing in the LOC, but that the spatial configuration of a figure that is surrounded by a larger background is both necessary and sufficient to selectively activate the LOC.

[1]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: an interactive account. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Edelman,et al.  Cue-Invariant Activation in Object-Related Areas of the Human Occipital Lobe , 1998, Neuron.

[4]  G. Orban,et al.  The kinetic occipital region in human visual cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  J. Victor,et al.  A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Anthony M Norcia,et al.  Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[9]  Victor A. F. Lamme The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Privileged coding of convex shapes in human object-selective cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  P. Roelfsema Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[14]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Figure-ground interaction in the human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[15]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Feedforward and Recurrent Processing in Scene Segmentation: Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Assessing direction-specific adaptation using the steady-state visual evoked potential: results from EEG source imaging. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[17]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Ko Sakai,et al.  Surrounding Suppression and Facilitation in the Determination of Border Ownership , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Border Ownership from Intracortical Interactions in Visual Area V2 , 2005, Neuron.

[22]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[23]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  A neural model of figure-ground organization. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Marc O Ernst,et al.  Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[25]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Cue-Invariant Networks for Figure and Background Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Linda Lundström,et al.  The pupils and optical systems of gecko eyes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[29]  S. Palmer Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Coding of Border Ownership in Monkey Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.