GPR imaging and characterization of ancient Roman ruins in the Aquileia Archaeological Park, NE Italy

Abstract Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) can successfully image buried archaeological structures based on changes in the electro-magnetic properties of the investigated materials. Particularly, GPR data interpretation is facilitated by the development of modern 3-D analysis techniques. Attribute analysis, originally developed to improve the quality and efficiency of data interpretation for hydrocarbon exploitation, was applied to our GPR study to image and characterize an archaeological site along the Roman fluvial harbor in the Aquileia Archaeological Park, NE Italy, namely one of the most important Roman archaeological areas in Europe. We calculated GPR attributes on GPR datasets. In detail, the energy was calculated towards comprehensive pseudo 3-D GPR interpretation, while similarity was analyzed to emphasize the continuity of the archaeological structures in a highly inhomogeneous background. The GPR results can correlate and calibrate previous limited archaeological pit tests, and provide detailed information about buried remains to plan further excavations. The subsequent localized excavations also validated the results obtained from the GPR survey. The research demonstrates that it is useful, and sometimes essential, applying GPR attribute analysis especially when GPR records with low signal-to-noise ratio are available and when the subsurface stratigraphy is complex due to several superimposed archaeological levels.

[1]  T. Wunderlich,et al.  Discovery of a Byzantine Church in Iznik/Nicaea, Turkey: an Educational Case History of Geophysical Prospecting with Combined Methods in Urban Areas , 2015 .

[2]  M. Bueno,et al.  Moenibus et portu celeberrima. Aquileia: storia di una città , 2009 .

[3]  J. O. Caselles,et al.  Integrated near-surface geophysical survey of the Cathedral of Mallorca , 2009 .

[4]  E. Forte,et al.  Integrated seismic tomography and ground-penetrating radar GPR for the high-resolution study of burial mounds tumuli , 2008 .

[5]  E. Forte,et al.  4-D quantitative GPR analyses to study the summer mass balance of a glacier: a case history , 2014, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[6]  E. Forte,et al.  Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) attribute analysis for archaeological prospection , 2013 .

[7]  B. Damiata,et al.  Imaging skeletal remains with ground-penetrating radar: comparative results over two graves from Viking Age and Medieval churchyards on the Stóra-Seyla farm, northern Iceland , 2013 .

[8]  Tavi Murray,et al.  Three‐dimensional, multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets , 2008 .

[9]  E. Pettinelli,et al.  Non-invasive archaeological exploration in stratigraphically complex rural settings: an example from Ferento (Viterbo, Italy) , 2013, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[10]  Dean Goodman,et al.  Correcting for topography and the tilt of ground‐penetrating radar antennae , 2006 .

[11]  Michele Pipan,et al.  High-resolution glacier imaging and characterization by means of GPR attribute analysis , 2016 .

[12]  Kristofer M. Tingdahl,et al.  Meta-attributes—the key to multivolume, multiattribute interpretation , 2002 .

[13]  Rexford M. Morey,et al.  Continuous Subsurface Profiling by Impulse Radar , 1974 .

[14]  Jaana Gustafsson,et al.  Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating Radar Array system , 2010 .

[15]  Dengliang Gao,et al.  Volume texture extraction for 3D seismic visualization and interpretation , 2003 .

[16]  E. Forte,et al.  Imaging and characterization of a carbonate hydrocarbon reservoir analogue using GPR attributes , 2012 .

[17]  M. A. H. El-Said,et al.  Geophysical Prospection of Underground Water in the Desert by Means of Electromagnetic Interference Fringes , 1956 .

[18]  Wolfgang Neubauer,et al.  First High‐resolution GPR and Magnetic Archaeological Prospection at the Viking Age Settlement of Birka in Sweden , 2014 .

[19]  U. Böniger,et al.  Improving the interpretability of 3D GPR data using target–specific attributes: application to tomb detection , 2010 .

[20]  E. Forte,et al.  High resolution GPR imaging and joint characterization in limestone , 2003 .

[21]  R. Persico.  Introduction to Ground Penetrating Radar: Inverse Scattering and Data Processing , 2014 .

[22]  John H. Bradford,et al.  Complex dielectric permittivity measurements from ground‐penetrating radar data to estimate snow liquid water content in the pendular regime , 2009 .

[23]  Lawrence B. Conyers,et al.  Interpreting Ground-penetrating Radar for Archaeology , 2012 .

[24]  N. Allroggen,et al.  3D ground-penetrating radar imaging of ice complex deposits in northern East Siberia , 2016 .

[25]  Michele Pipan,et al.  Review of multi-offset GPR applications: Data acquisition, processing and analysis , 2017, Signal Process..

[26]  Meriç A. Berge,et al.  Integrated geophysical surveys for the subsurface mapping of buried structures under and surrounding of the Agios Voukolos Church in İzmir, Turkey , 2011 .

[27]  E. Rhodes,et al.  Investigation of the age and migration of reversing dunes in Antarctica using GPR and OSL, with implications for GPR on Mars , 2010 .

[28]  E. Pettinelli,et al.  Radio wave techniques for non-destructive archaeological investigations , 2011 .

[29]  Morag M. Kersel,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar investigations at Marj Rabba, a Chalcolithic site in the lower Galilee of Israel , 2014 .

[30]  E. Forte,et al.  Ground penetrating radar study of iron age tombs in Southeastern Kazakhstan , 2001 .

[31]  Peter Annan,et al.  A review of Ground Penetrating Radar application in civil engineering: A 30-year journey from Locating and Testing to Imaging and Diagnosis , 2017, NDT & E International.

[32]  E. Forte,et al.  Improved high-resolution GPR imaging and characterization of prehistoric archaeological features by means of attribute analysis , 2015 .

[33]  E. Forte,et al.  2-D and 3-D processing and interpretation of multi-fold ground penetrating radar data:a case history from an archaeological site , 1999 .

[34]  J. Leckebusch,et al.  Ground‐penetrating radar: a modern three‐dimensional prospection method , 2003 .

[35]  Imaging of an active fault: Comparison between 3D GPR data and outcrops at the Castrovillari fault, Calabria, Italy , 2015 .

[36]  Federico Lombardi,et al.  Effects of antenna orientation on 3-D ground penetrating radar surveys: an archaeological perspective , 2014 .

[37]  E. Forte,et al.  Texture Attribute Analysis of GPR Data for Archaeological Prospection , 2016, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[38]  B. Berard,et al.  Multi-offset ground penetrating radar data for improved imaging in areas of lateral complexity — Application at a Native American site , 2007 .

[39]  K. Kvamme,et al.  Data processing issues in large‐area GPR surveys: correcting trace misalignments, edge discontinuities and striping , 2008 .

[40]  Pier Matteo Barone,et al.  Understanding Buried Anomalies: A Practical Guide to GPR , 2016 .

[41]  D. Goodman,et al.  GPR surveying over burial mounds: correcting for topography and the tilt of the GPR antenna , 2007 .

[42]  A. Ribolini,et al.  Medieval phases of settlement at Benabbio castle, Apennine mountains, Italy: evidence from Ground Penetrating Radar survey , 2010 .

[43]  Michael S. Bahorich,et al.  3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features; the coherence cube , 1995 .