A Display for Supporting Ownership of Virtual Arms

To enable convincing first-person interactions involving object manipulation, virtual reality systems need to represent the user’s body in the virtual environment. Virtual body parts, particularly the arms and hands, must appear in the correct perceived spatial positions in a first-person view so that users can “take ownership” of them. One current method to achieve this goal is head-mounted displays, but they have cost and motion sickness problems. Other methods such as table-top projections have problems with image occlusion by the user’s own limbs. In this paper we describe a low-cost alternative using a mirrored horizontal display which places virtual arms in the correct position relative to the user on a table top. We hypothesized that, compared to a normal monitor, our display provides improved subjective ownership of virtual limbs while maintaining equivalent ease of use. Questionnaires on healthy subjects showed that they found it easier to induce selfownership of virtual arms using our display. We also compared a virtual rubber hand illusion using our display with a real rubber hand illusion and found comparable ownership results. We conclude that our display can support improved ownership of virtual arms compared to a normal vertical display.

[1]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  Immersion without encumbrance: adapting a virtual reality system for the rehabilitation of individuals with stroke and spinal cord injury , 2002 .

[2]  Erik Geelhoed,et al.  Safety and Comfort of Eyeglass Displays , 2000, HUC.

[3]  Randy Pausch,et al.  A user study comparing head-mounted and stationary displays , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE Research Properties in Virtual Reality Symposium.

[4]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.

[5]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments , 2000, CHI.

[6]  Makoto Yoshizawa,et al.  Diagnosis and rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect patients with virtual reality technology. , 2005, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  Noomi Katz,et al.  Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Moira B. Flanagan,et al.  Motion Sickness, Console Video Games, and Head-Mounted Displays , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[11]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  G. Riva,et al.  A Strategy for Computer-Assisted Mental Practice in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Is This My Hand I See Before Me? The Rubber Hand Illusion in Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[14]  L. Stone,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror , 1999, The Lancet.

[15]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.