Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew.

We examined the effects of letter transposition in Hebrew in three masked-priming experiments. Hebrew, like English has an alphabetic orthography where sequential and contiguous letter strings represent phonemes. However, being a Semitic language it has a non-concatenated morphology that is based on root derivations. Experiment 1 showed that transposed-letter (TL) root primes inhibited responses to targets derived from the non-transposed root letters, and that this inhibition was unrelated to relative root frequency. Experiment 2 replicated this result and showed that if the transposed letters of the root created a nonsense-root that had no lexical representation, then no inhibition and no facilitation were obtained. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that in contrast to English, French, or Spanish, TL nonword primes did not facilitate recognition of targets, and when the root letters embedded in them consisted of a legal root morpheme, they produced inhibition. These results suggest that lexical space in alphabetic orthographies may be structured very differently in different languages if their morphological structure diverges qualitatively. In Hebrew, lexical space is organized according to root families rather than simple orthographic structure, so that all words derived from the same root are interconnected or clustered together, independent of overall orthographic similarity.

[1]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[2]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990 .

[3]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? , 2008 .

[4]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  J. Elman An alternative view of the mental lexicon , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit , 2000 .

[8]  Shmuel Bolozky,et al.  Modern Hebrew structure , 1982 .

[9]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[10]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  K. Forster,et al.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[14]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[15]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. , 1991 .

[16]  K I Forster,et al.  Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[18]  K. Forster,et al.  Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  L. Glinert The Grammar of Modern Hebrew , 1989 .

[21]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors , 2008, Cognition.

[22]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked priming with orthographic neighbors: a test of the lexical competition assumption. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[25]  R Frost,et al.  Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: evidence from English and Hebrew. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[27]  K. Forster Form-priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. , 1987 .

[28]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Language and Cognitive Processes beyond Alphabetic Orthographies: the Role of Form and Phonology in Transposition Effects in Katakana , 2022 .

[29]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[30]  Kenneth R. Pugh,et al.  How Children Learn to Read : Current Issues and New Directions in the Integration of Cognition, Neurobiology and Genetics of Reading and Dyslexia Research and Practice , 2011 .

[31]  M Taft,et al.  Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  K. Forster,et al.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[34]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition , 2007, Cognition.

[36]  J Grainger,et al.  Effects of Orthography are Independent of Phonology in Masked form Priming , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[37]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[38]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[39]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency , 2008 .

[41]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[42]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[43]  Jay G. Rueckl,et al.  The Dynamics of Visual Word Recognition , 2002 .

[44]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[45]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.

[46]  D. Plaut,et al.  The processing of root morphemes in Hebrew: Contrasting localist and distributed accounts , 2005 .

[47]  Roy Davis,et al.  Attention and performance in the workplace , 1999 .

[48]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[49]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[50]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Letter Position Dyslexia , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[51]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[53]  Carol Whitney,et al.  Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model , 2008 .

[54]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Raeding Wrods With Jubmled Lettres , 2006, Psychological science.

[55]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[57]  David E. Kieras,et al.  New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .

[58]  M. Ahissar,et al.  Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming , 2003 .

[59]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .

[60]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Masked form priming with extreme transposition , 2008 .

[61]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[62]  Ram Frost,et al.  Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia , 2006, Behavioural neurology.

[64]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Modeling the Successes and Failures of Interventions for Disabled Readers , 2003 .

[65]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation (rsvp): a method for studying language processing , 2018 .

[66]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew , 2005 .