A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

[1]  M. Kattan,et al.  Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[2]  John T. Wei,et al.  Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score? , 2009, Human pathology.

[3]  C. Pan,et al.  The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[4]  L. Egevad,et al.  Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[5]  P. Scardino,et al.  Correlation between side of palpable tumor and side of pelvic lymph node metastasis in clinically localized prostate cancer , 1992, Cancer.

[6]  D. Park,et al.  Evaluation of pT2 subdivisions in the TNM staging system for prostate cancer , 2008, BJU international.

[7]  B. Trock,et al.  Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[8]  J. Epstein,et al.  Fragmentation of prostatic needle biopsy cores containing adenocarcinoma: the role of specimen submission , 2010, BJU international.

[9]  M. Kattan,et al.  Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. , 1998, Human pathology.

[10]  J. Epstein,et al.  Widespread High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Prostatic Needle Biopsy: A Significant Likelihood of Subsequently Diagnosed Adenocarcinoma , 2006, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[11]  T. Stamey,et al.  The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[12]  L. Sullivan,et al.  Transition zone carcinoma of the prostate. , 1995, The Canadian journal of urology.

[13]  J. Epstein,et al.  Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Madeleine Moussa,et al.  Interobserver Variability Between Expert Urologic Pathologists for Extraprostatic Extension and Surgical Margin Status in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[15]  V. Reuter.  Pathological changes in benign and malignant prostatic tissue following androgen deprivation therapy. , 1997, Urology.

[16]  P. Scardino,et al.  Prostate Cancer Topography and Patterns of Lymph Node Metastasis , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[17]  D G McGowan,et al.  Evaluation of histological grading (Gleason) in carcinoma of the prostate: Adverse influence of highest grade , 1983, The Prostate.

[18]  P. Scardino,et al.  Anterior-predominant Prostatic Tumors: Zone of Origin and Pathologic Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  G. Ayala,et al.  In vitro dorsal root ganglia and human prostate cell line interaction: Redefining perineural invasion in prostate cancer , 2001, The Prostate.

[20]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[21]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma: predictive accuracy in needle biopsies. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Does pT2b prostate carcinoma exist? Critical appraisal of the 2002 TNM classification of prostate carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[23]  J. Epstein,et al.  Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma with glomeruloid features on needle biopsy. , 2009, Human pathology.

[24]  A. Partin,et al.  Influence of biopsy perineural invasion on long-term biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.

[25]  J. Cheville,et al.  The focus of "atypical glands, suspicious for malignancy" in prostatic needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features, and clinical follow-up of cases diagnosed in a community practice. , 1997, American journal of clinical pathology.

[26]  R. Zarbo,et al.  Analysis of cribriform morphology in prostatic neoplasia using antibody to high-molecular-weight cytokeratins. , 1994, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[27]  L. Egevad,et al.  Current practice of diagnosis and reporting of prostate cancer on needle biopsy among genitourinary pathologists. , 2006, Human pathology.

[28]  V. Reuter,et al.  What is the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens? , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[29]  M. Rubin,et al.  Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy: an independent predictor of final pathologic stage. , 1999, Urology.

[30]  K. Trpkov,et al.  How much tissue sampling is required when unsuspected minimal prostate carcinoma is identified on transurethral resection? , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[31]  M. Zelefsky,et al.  Histopathologic effects of three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy on benign and malignant prostate tissues. , 1999, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[32]  J. Epstein,et al.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent small atypical glands on prostate biopsy. , 2001, Human pathology.

[33]  Victor E Reuter,et al.  Influence of local tumor control on distant metastases and cancer related mortality after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[34]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Should pathologists routinely report prostate tumour volume? The prognostic value of tumour volume in prostate cancer. , 2010, European urology.

[35]  J. Cuzick,et al.  An improved prognostic model for stage T1a and T1b prostate cancer by assessments of cancer extent , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[36]  P. Scardino,et al.  Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2007, Urology.

[37]  Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance , 2003, Virchows Archiv.

[38]  B. Delahunt,et al.  Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (International Society of Urological Pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point , 2010, Pathology.

[39]  J. Melamed,et al.  Followup interval prostate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[40]  J. Epstein,et al.  Prognosis of Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate Treated by Radical Prostatectomy: A Study of 47 Cases , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[41]  Sten Nilsson,et al.  Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens , 2005, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.

[42]  Lars Egevad,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[43]  A. Lopez‐Beltran,et al.  Editorial Comment to When should we expect no residual tumor (pT0) once we submit incidental T1a‐b prostate cancers to radical prostatectomy? , 2011, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[44]  S. Raab.  A Contemporary Study Correlating Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score , 2009 .

[45]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Prognostic value of various morphometric measurements of tumour extent in prostate needle core tissue , 2008, Histopathology.

[46]  Yusuke Nakamura,et al.  Molecular Features of the Transition from Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN) to Prostate Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[47]  P. Scardino,et al.  Is tumor volume an independent prognostic factor in clinically localized prostate cancer? , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[48]  A W Partin,et al.  Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy. , 2000, Urology.

[49]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Perineural invasion is associated with increased relapse after external beam radiotherapy for men with low-risk prostate cancer and may be a marker for occult, high-grade cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[50]  M. Rubin,et al.  Inadequate formalin fixation decreases reliability of p27 immunohistochemical staining: probing optimal fixation time using high-density tissue microarrays. , 2002, Human pathology.

[51]  H. Levin,et al.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate does not confer poor prognosis. , 2006, Urology.

[52]  A. Hoznek,et al.  Impact of the primary Gleason pattern on biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cohort of 1,248 patients with Gleason 7 tumors , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[53]  M. Rubin,et al.  Can perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy predict prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy? , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[54]  Rodolfo Montironi,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[55]  B. Mian,et al.  Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[56]  A. Partin,et al.  The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[57]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. , 2010, Human pathology.

[58]  D. Carter.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors , 1998 .

[59]  M. Kattan,et al.  Analysis of clinical stage T2 prostate cancer: do current subclassifications represent an improvement? , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[60]  J. Moul,et al.  Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[61]  J. Epstein.  Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[62]  P. Walsh,et al.  The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[63]  A. Partin,et al.  Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis. , 2010, Urology.

[64]  D J Ruiter,et al.  HISTOLOGICAL GRADE HETEROGENEITY IN MULTIFOCAL PROSTATE CANCER. BIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS , 1996, The Journal of pathology.

[65]  F. Burkhard,et al.  Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[66]  L. Egevad,et al.  Correlation of modified Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma with age, serum prostate specific antigen and tumor extent in needle biopsy specimens. , 2008, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[67]  David J. Grignon,et al.  The Prostatic Capsule: Does It Exist? Its Importance in the Staging and Treatment of Prostatic Carcinoma , 1989, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[68]  A. Partin,et al.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen. , 2010, Urology.

[69]  P. Scardino,et al.  The Mechanisms and Prognostic Significance of Seminal Vesicle Involvement by Prostate Cancer , 1993, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[70]  V. Reuter,et al.  Editorial comment. Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis. , 2010, Urology.

[71]  L. Egevad,et al.  Handling and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens in Europe: a web‐based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP) , 2008, Histopathology.

[72]  B. Hadaschik,et al.  Outcome of radical prostatectomy for incidental carcinoma of the prostate , 2009, BJU international.

[73]  M. Rubin,et al.  Prostate Needle Biopsy Reporting: How Are the Surgical Members of the Society of Urologic Oncology Using Pathology Reports to Guide Treatment of Prostate Cancer Patients? , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[74]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of prostate‐specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in patients with pT3aN0 prostate cancer , 2008, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[75]  J. Epstein,et al.  Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate without invasive carcinoma on needle biopsy: emphasis on radical prostatectomy findings. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[76]  K. Trpkov,et al.  The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice , 2009, Histopathology.

[77]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Stratified epithelium in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a mimic of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[78]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[79]  M. Kattan,et al.  Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[80]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[81]  E. Messing,et al.  Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[82]  P. Humphrey,et al.  The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[83]  J. Epstein,et al.  Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: histologic features and clinical significance , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[84]  P. Walsh,et al.  Relationship Between Perineural Tumor Invasion on Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Capsular Penetration in Clinical Stage B Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate , 1993, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[85]  P. Scardino,et al.  Anatomy of the Anterior Prostate and Extraprostatic Space: A Contemporary Surgical Pathology Analysis , 2007, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[86]  S. Best,et al.  Integrity of prostatic tissue for molecular analysis after robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open prostatectomy. , 2007, Urology.

[87]  J. Epstein,et al.  Gleason score 2-4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: a diagnosis that should not be made. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[88]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[89]  T. Schlomm,et al.  Zonal origin of localized prostate cancer does not affect the rate of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2007, European urology.

[90]  U. Capitanio.  Contemporary management of patients with T1a and T1b prostate cancer , 2011, Current opinion in urology.

[91]  J. Epstein.  Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma , 2008, Virchows Archiv.

[92]  J. Epstein,et al.  The reporting of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: prognostic and therapeutic implications and the utility of diagnostic markers. , 2003, Pathology.

[93]  Andrea Salonia,et al.  Predictors of prostate cancer after initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation at 10 to 12 core biopsies. , 2005, Urology.

[94]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[95]  B. Trock,et al.  Should Intervening Benign Tissue Be Included in the Measurement of Discontinuous Foci of Cancer on Prostate Needle Biopsy? Correlation With Radical Prostatectomy Findings , 2011, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[96]  L. Egevad,et al.  The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens , 2006, Virchows Archiv.

[97]  J. Epstein,et al.  Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[98]  Lars Egevad,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[99]  J. Chin,et al.  Location of a positive biopsy as a predictor of surgical margin status and extraprostatic disease in radical prostatectomy , 2006, BJU international.

[100]  J. Bailar,et al.  The histology and prognosis of prostatic cancer. , 1967, The Journal of urology.

[101]  J. Srigley,et al.  Multifocal high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a significant risk factor for prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[102]  J. Epstein,et al.  High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Needle Biopsy: Risk of Cancer on Repeat Biopsy Related to Number of Involved Cores and Morphologic Pattern , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[103]  J. Srigley.  Benign mimickers of prostatic adenocarcinoma , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[104]  M. Rubin,et al.  Cribriform carcinoma of the prostate and cribriform prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: incidence and clinical implications. , 1998, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[105]  A. Abeygunasekera.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. , 2014, The Ceylon medical journal.

[106]  K. Harada,et al.  Analysis of differences in clinicopathological features between prostate cancers located in the transition and peripheral zones , 2006, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[107]  R. Cohen,et al.  Transition zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a common indolent tumour type that occasionally manifests aggressive behaviour , 2003, Pathology.

[108]  Jing Ma,et al.  Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3? , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[109]  U. Capitanio,et al.  When should we expect no residual tumor (pT0) once we submit incidental T1a‐b prostate cancers to radical prostatectomy? , 2011, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[110]  A. Billis.  Does perineural invasion on prostate biopsy predict adverse prostatectomy outcomes , 2009 .

[111]  A. Partin,et al.  Ability of sextant biopsies to predict radical prostatectomy stage. , 1998, Urology.

[112]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Multiple Measures of Carcinoma Extent Versus Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Tissue in Prediction of Pathologic Stage in a Screening Population , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[113]  A. Renshaw,et al.  PSA failure following definitive treatment of prostate cancer having biopsy Gleason score 7 with tertiary grade 5. , 2007, JAMA.

[114]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[115]  Athanase Billis,et al.  The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[116]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.

[117]  M. Mason,et al.  The prognostic significance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies , 2007, Cancer.

[118]  A. Lopez‐Beltran,et al.  PATHOLOGICAL DEFINITION AND DIFFICULTIES IN ASSESSING POSITIVE MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS , 2009, BJU international.

[119]  P. Scardino,et al.  Relationship between clinical stage and histological zone of origin in early prostate cancer: morphometric analysis. , 1991, British journal of urology.

[120]  M. Riggs,et al.  Frozen section diagnosis of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma in pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with nomogram prediction of metastasis. , 2002, Urology.

[121]  W. Ellis,et al.  Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason 7 prostate cancer predicts pathological stage and biochemical recurrence. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[122]  Ximing J. Yang,et al.  Grading of Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma on Prostate Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Study among Experts in Genitourinary Pathology , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[123]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Preoperative prediction of Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: the influence of different Gleason grades from multiple positive biopsy sites , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[124]  Misop Han,et al.  Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[125]  P. Humphrey.  Tumor amount in prostatic tissues in relation to patient outcome and management. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[126]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[127]  T. Tsuzuki,et al.  The Prognostic Significance of Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[128]  B. Delahunt,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[129]  Ronglai Shen,et al.  Changes in differential gene expression because of warm ischemia time of radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[130]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. , 2007, Urology.

[131]  M. Meng,et al.  Changing patterns of pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[132]  M. Kattan,et al.  Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[133]  J. Epstein,et al.  Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer. , 1999, Urology.

[134]  L. Liotta,et al.  Evidence of independent origin of multiple tumors from patients with prostate cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[135]  M. Kattan,et al.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[136]  H. Schröder,et al.  [Prognosis of the prostatic carcinoma]. , 1969, Bruns' Beitrage fur klinische Chirurgie.

[137]  T. Stamey,et al.  Stage A versus stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate: morphological comparison and biological significance. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[138]  Christopher Otis,et al.  Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma. , 2007, Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology.

[139]  L. Egevad,et al.  Current practice of diagnosis and reporting of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and glandular atypia among genitourinary pathologists , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[140]  S. Taneja,et al.  Long-term follow-up of men with isolated high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia followed by serial delayed interval biopsy. , 2011, Urology.

[141]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens , 2005, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.

[142]  P. Scardino,et al.  Patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia associated with clinically aggressive prostate cancer. , 1998, Human pathology.

[143]  J. Epstein,et al.  A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[144]  Liang Cheng,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[145]  J. Epstein,et al.  Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system , 2010, Nature Reviews Urology.

[146]  Y. Inayama,et al.  Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens , 2009, BJU international.

[147]  E. Klein,et al.  Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer , 2009, BJU international.

[148]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Detection rates of cancer, high grade PIN and atypical lesions suspicious for cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[149]  A W Partin,et al.  Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. , 1997, JAMA.

[150]  M. Kattan,et al.  Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[151]  S. Fine.  Variants and Unusual Patterns of Prostate Cancer. , 2008, Surgical pathology clinics.

[152]  J. McNeal,et al.  Spread of adenocarcinoma within prostatic ducts and acini. Morphologic and clinical correlations. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[153]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Closest Distance Between Tumor and Resection Margin in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Lack of Prognostic Significance , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[154]  H. Levin,et al.  Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[155]  T. Stamey,et al.  An analysis of 148 consecutive transition zone cancers: clinical and histological characteristics. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[156]  J. Epstein,et al.  Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[157]  D. Bostwick,et al.  High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: Predictive Value for Cancer in Current Practice , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[158]  A. Partin,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control. , 1997, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[159]  P. Walsh,et al.  Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term followup. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[160]  M. Kattan,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of disease progression in prostate cancer. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[161]  E. Klein,et al.  High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia , 2012, Korean journal of urology.

[162]  U. Ferreira,et al.  Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy? , 2011, International Urology and Nephrology.

[163]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence. , 2008, European urology.

[164]  K. Pummer,et al.  Did the rate of incidental prostate cancer change in the era of PSA testing? A retrospective study of 1127 patients. , 2003, Urology.

[165]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[166]  C. Pan,et al.  Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2001, Human pathology.

[167]  J. Epstein,et al.  Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate gleason score? , 2003, Human pathology.

[168]  D. Grignon,et al.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate: histochemical and immunohistochemical studies. , 1990, Human pathology.