A locally anisotropic fluid–structure interaction remeshing strategy for thin structures with application to a hinged rigid leaflet

We apply an “immersed” finite element approach discussed in [1] for the 2D steady incompressible Stokes equations to a 2D fluid-structure interaction problem in a tube with a thin (i.e., codimension 1) hinged rigid leaflet sets in motion by an incompressible unsteady flow. In order to change the minimal possible fraction of elements we remesh only the triangles that are cut by the structure. Furthermore, with this approach essential constraints between the fluid and the solid may be strongly enforced in the finite element spaces and it is fairly easy to allow the fluid stress to be discontinuous across the structure. An obvious consequence of the proposed remeshing strategy is the presence of anisotropic triangles, for which it is known that the standard finite element method may be used (see, e.g., [2]). However, for mixed elements most of the inf-sup stability proofs require isotropic meshes and only few results are available on distorted triangles. In [1], the inf-sup stability of the Hood-Taylor element with the present method has been discussed. It was shown that instabilities may occur but also that adding a bubble in the velocity space stabilizes the element. In the present work we apply and extend the results presented in [1] to a 2D fluid-structure problem with a codimension 1 structure immersed in the fluid domain. As a consequence, it may be convenient to use mixed elements with a discontinuous pressure. Indeed, with such elements the discontinuity in the pressure field across the structure is straightforwardly enforced. We discuss the use of the P2/P0 and the P2-bubble/P1-discontinuous elements with the proposed remeshing algorithm. However, we also consider the elements in [1] with a discontinuous pressure is across the structure. Numerical tests show that the two elements with a discontinuous pressure suffer inf-sup stability issues in a more severe way than the Hood-Taylor element. The P2/P0 and P2-bubble/P1-discontinuous elements show spurious modes along the structure, and thus not only in corners as in the case of the Hood-Taylor element. On the contrary, the Hood-Taylor element with an additional bubble do not show any spurious modes in the performed tests. The deleterious effects of inf-sup instabilities are also observed in the conditioning of the linear system. Furthermore, in [3] a similar fluid-structure interaction algorithm to the one presented here is employed using the P2-bubble/P1-discontinuous element. However, a smoothing strategy is used such that all triangles are isotropic. Our results show in particular the necessity of such a smoothing with that element.

[1]  F. Brezzi,et al.  Basic principles of Virtual Element Methods , 2013 .

[2]  Brummelen van Eh,et al.  Flux evaluation in primal and dual boundary-coupled problems , 2011 .

[3]  Ralf Gritzki,et al.  Stabilized FEM with Anisotropic Mesh Refinement for the Oseen Problem , 2006 .

[4]  P. Jamet Estimations d'erreur pour des éléments finis droits presque dégénérés , 1976 .

[5]  L. Demkowicz A note on symmetry boundary conditions in finite element methods , 1991 .

[6]  Alexei Lozinski,et al.  A fictitious domain approach for the Stokes problem based on the extended finite element method , 2013, 1303.6850.

[7]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Large deformation fluid structure interaction - advances in ALE methods and new fixed grid approaches , 2006 .

[8]  Michal Křížek,et al.  On semiregular families of triangulations and linear interpolation , 1991 .

[9]  Simona Perotto,et al.  Stabilized Finite Elements on Anisotropic Meshes: A Priori Error Estimates for the Advection-Diffusion and the Stokes Problems , 2003, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[10]  K. Zee,et al.  Goal-Oriented A-Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptivity for Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2008 .

[11]  B. Maury,et al.  A smooth extension method , 2013 .

[12]  S. Sherwin,et al.  Comparison of various fluid-structure interaction methods for deformable bodies , 2007 .

[13]  T. Apel Anisotropic Finite Elements: Local Estimates and Applications , 1999 .

[14]  Gianni Pedrizzetti,et al.  Flow-driven opening of a valvular leaflet , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  I. Babuska,et al.  ON THE ANGLE CONDITION IN THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 1976 .

[16]  N. Santos Numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction problems with valves , 2007 .

[17]  Role of inertia in the interaction between oscillatory flow and a wall-mounted leaflet. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  D. Eppstein,et al.  MESH GENERATION AND OPTIMAL TRIANGULATION , 1992 .

[19]  Long Chen FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2013 .

[20]  Weizhang Huang,et al.  Conditioning of finite element equations with arbitrary anisotropic meshes , 2012, Math. Comput..

[21]  W. Wall,et al.  An eXtended Finite Element Method/Lagrange multiplier based approach for fluid-structure interaction , 2008 .

[22]  Jean-Frédéric Gerbeau,et al.  AN EMBEDDED SURFACE METHOD FOR VALVE SIMULATION. APPLICATION TO STENOTIC AORTIC VALVE ESTIMATION , 2005 .

[23]  Patrick D. Anderson,et al.  A fluid-structure interaction method with solid-rigid contact for heart valve dynamics , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  Jean-Francois Hetu,et al.  A finite element immersed boundary method for fluid flow around rigid objects , 2011 .

[25]  G. Golub,et al.  Structured inverse eigenvalue problems , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[26]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems , 2005 .

[27]  Antti Hannukainen,et al.  The maximum angle condition is not necessary for convergence of the finite element method , 2012, Numerische Mathematik.

[28]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[29]  Franco Brezzi,et al.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Virtual Element Method , 2014 .

[30]  I. Procaccia,et al.  Identification and calculation of the universal asymptote for drag reduction by polymers in wall bounded turbulence. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[31]  V. Brummelen Added Mass Effects of Compressible and Incompressible Flows in Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2009 .

[33]  Antonio J. Gil,et al.  The Immersed Structural Potential Method for haemodynamic applications , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[34]  Gianni Pedrizzetti Kinematic characterization of valvular opening. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[35]  Barry Lee,et al.  Finite elements and fast iterative solvers: with applications in incompressible fluid dynamics , 2006, Math. Comput..

[36]  L. Heltai,et al.  Variational implementation of immersed finite element methods , 2011, 1110.2063.

[37]  Bertrand Maury,et al.  A Fat Boundary Method for the Poisson Problem in a Domain with Holes , 2002, J. Sci. Comput..

[38]  Trond Kvamsdal,et al.  Goal oriented error estimators for Stokes equations based on variationally consistent postprocessing , 2003 .

[39]  Thomas Apel,et al.  Stability of discretizations of the Stokes problem on anisotropic meshes , 2003, Math. Comput. Simul..

[40]  Thomas Richter,et al.  A Locally Modified Parametric Finite Element Method for Interface Problems , 2014, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[41]  Serge Nicaise,et al.  The inf-sup condition for low order elements on anisotropic meshes , 2004 .

[42]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  A study on unfitted 1D finite element methods , 2014, Comput. Math. Appl..

[43]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications , 2013 .

[44]  P. Hansbo,et al.  An unfitted finite element method, based on Nitsche's method, for elliptic interface problems , 2002 .

[45]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARIES AND FLUX AND PRESSURE CONDITIONS FOR THE INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS , 1996 .

[46]  A. Lew,et al.  A discontinuous‐Galerkin‐based immersed boundary method , 2008 .

[47]  W. Wall,et al.  A Solution for the Incompressibility Dilemma in Partitioned Fluid–Structure Interaction with Pure Dirichlet Fluid Domains , 2006 .

[48]  P. G. Ciarlet,et al.  Numerical Methods for Fluids, Part 3 , 2003 .

[49]  P. Hansbo,et al.  A cut finite element method for a Stokes interface problem , 2012, 1205.5684.

[50]  J. Guermond,et al.  Theory and practice of finite elements , 2004 .

[51]  Hamilton-Jacobi Equations,et al.  Mixed Finite Element Methods for , 1996 .

[52]  F. Brezzi,et al.  An "immersed" finite element method based on a locally anisotropic remeshing for the incompressible Stokes problem , 2015 .