Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses.

One of the values of biodiversity is that it may provide 'biological insurance' for services currently rendered by domesticated species or technology. We used crop pollination as a model system, and investigated whether the loss of a domesticated pollinator (the honey bee) could be compensated for by native, wild bee species. We measured pollination provided to watermelon crops at 23 farms in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA, and used a simulation model to separate the pollen provided by honey bees and native bees. Simulation results predict that native bees alone provide sufficient pollination at > 90% of the farms studied. Furthermore, empirical total pollen deposition at flowers was strongly, significantly correlated with native bee visitation but not with honey bee visitation. The honey bee is currently undergoing extensive die-offs because of Colony Collapse Disorder. We predict that in our region native bees will buffer potential declines in agricultural production because of honey bee losses.

[1]  Hannah R. Gaines,et al.  Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land‐use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA , 2007 .

[2]  E. Stokstad.  Puzzling Decline of U.S. Bees Linked to Virus From Australia , 2007, Science.

[3]  Erik Stokstad,et al.  The Case of the Empty Hives , 2007, Science.

[4]  Sarah S. Greenleaf,et al.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size , 2007, Oecologia.

[5]  M. Aizen,et al.  Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[6]  A. Klein,et al.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  C. Kremen,et al.  Effect of Human Disturbance on Bee Communities in a Forested Ecosystem , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  M. Rundlöf,et al.  The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context , 2006 .

[9]  Sarah S. Greenleaf,et al.  Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Aizen,et al.  Edge effects on flower-visiting insects in grapefruit plantations bordering premontane subtropical forest. , 2005 .

[11]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services , 2005 .

[12]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants , 2005 .

[13]  Carsten Thies,et al.  Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[14]  M. Winston,et al.  WILD BEE ABUNDANCE AND SEED PRODUCTION IN CONVENTIONAL, ORGANIC, AND GENETICALLY MODIFIED CANOLA , 2005 .

[15]  N. Williams,et al.  Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[16]  C. Kremen.  Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[17]  Jonathan Dushoff,et al.  Testing Simple Indices of Habitat Proximity , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California , 2004 .

[19]  T. Ricketts.  Tropical Forest Fragments Enhance Pollinator Activity in Nearby Coffee Crops , 2004 .

[20]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Determining the Spatial Scale of Species' Response to Habitat , 2004 .

[21]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover , 2003 .

[22]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience , 2003 .

[23]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management , 2003 .

[24]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  William F. Morris,et al.  13. Which Mutualists Are Most Essential? Buffering of Plant Reproduction against the Extinction of Pollinators , 2003 .

[26]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ON THREE POLLINATOR GUILDS , 2002 .

[28]  J. Ambrose,et al.  Diurnal activity, floral visitation and pollen deposition by honey bees and bumble bees on field-grown cucumber and watermelon , 2002 .

[29]  K. Delaplane,et al.  Crop Pollination by Bees , 2000 .

[30]  A. Stephenson,et al.  Pollen competition in a natural population of Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae). , 2000, American journal of botany.

[31]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Species Redundancy and Ecosystem Reliability , 1998 .

[32]  J. Ambrose,et al.  Seed Production in Watermelon: A Comparison between Two Commercially Available Pollinators , 1998 .

[33]  M. Klemm.  Man-made bee habitats in the anthropogenous landscape of central Europe - substitutes for threatened or destroyed riverine habitats? , 1996 .

[34]  J. Thomson.  Pollen Transport and Deposition by Bumble Bees in Erythronium: Influences of Floral Nectar and Bee Grooming , 1986 .

[35]  J. Dushoff,et al.  A Monte Carlo model for estimating the productivity of a generalist brood parasite across multiple host species. , 2006 .

[36]  R. Morse,et al.  The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. Crops in 2000. , 2001 .

[37]  C. Michener.  The Bees of the World , 2000 .

[38]  G. Nabhan,et al.  Services provided by pollinators , 1997 .