Multi-joint limbs permit a flexible response to unpredictable events

Abstract The human arm is kinematically redundant, which may allow flexibility in the execution of reaching movements. We have compared reaching movements with and without kinematic redundancy to unpredictable double-step targets. Subjects sat in front of a digitising tablet and were able to view an arc of four targets reflected in the mirror as virtual images in the plane of the tablet. They were instructed to move, from a central starting point, in as straight a line as possible to a target. In one-third of trials, the target light switched to one of its neighbours during the movement. Subjects made 60 movements using shoulder, elbow and wrist and then another 60 movements in which only shoulder and elbow movement were allowed. By restraining the wrist, the limb was made non-redundant. The path length was calculated for each movement. In single-step trials, there was no significant difference between path lengths performed with and without wrist restraint. As expected there was a significant increase in path length during double-step trials. Moreover this increase was significantly greater when the wrist was restrained. The variability across both single- and double-step movements was significantly less while the wrist was restrained. Importantly the performance time of the movements did not alter significantly for single-step, double-step or restrained movements. These results suggest that the nervous system exploits the intrinsic redundancy of the limb when controlling voluntary movements and is therefore more effective at reprogramming movements to double-step targets.

[1]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[3]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  J. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[6]  P. Matthews The neural and behavioural organisation of goal-directed movements by Marc Jeannerod, Clarendon Press, 1988. £32.50 (xi + 283 pages) ISBN 0 19 852117 0 , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  John F. Kalaska,et al.  Reaching movements to visual targets: neuronal representations of sensori-motor transformations , 1991 .

[8]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  A Model of the Effects of Speed, Accuracy, and Perturbation on Visually Guided Reaching , 1992 .

[9]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  M Desmurget,et al.  Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R. C. Miall,et al.  Motor control, biological and theoretical , 1998 .