Mathematical modelling of infectious diseases.

INTRODUCTION Mathematical models allow us to extrapolate from current information about the state and progress of an outbreak, to predict the future and, most importantly, to quantify the uncertainty in these predictions. Here, we illustrate these principles in relation to the current H1N1 epidemic. SOURCES OF DATA Many sources of data are used in mathematical modelling, with some forms of model requiring vastly more data than others. However, a good estimation of the number of cases is vitally important. AREAS OF AGREEMENT Mathematical models, and the statistical tools that underpin them, are now a fundamental element in planning control and mitigation measures against any future epidemic of an infectious disease. Well-parameterized mathematical models allow us to test a variety of possible control strategies in computer simulations before applying them in reality. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY The interaction between modellers and public-health practitioners and the level of detail needed for models to be of use. GROWING POINTS The need for stronger statistical links between models and data. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH Greater appreciation by the medical community of the uses and limitations of models and a greater appreciation by modellers of the constraints on public-health resources.

[1]  A. Pentland,et al.  Eigenbehaviors: identifying structure in routine , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  P. Craven Spread of Infection in the Infectious Diseases Office , 1994 .

[3]  W. Getz,et al.  Curtailing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome within a community and its hospital† , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  M. Begon,et al.  A clarification of transmission terms in host-microparasite models: numbers, densities and areas , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[5]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain , 2001, Nature.

[6]  S. Riley Large-Scale Spatial-Transmission Models of Infectious Disease , 2007, Science.

[7]  A. Pentland,et al.  Eigenbehaviors: identifying structure in routine , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[9]  Marta C. González,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[10]  D. Schenzle An age-structured model of pre- and post-vaccination measles transmission. , 1984, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[11]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .

[12]  S. Cornell,et al.  Dynamics of the 2001 UK Foot and Mouth Epidemic: Stochastic Dispersal in a Heterogeneous Landscape , 2001, Science.

[13]  M. Bartlett Measles Periodicity and Community Size , 1957 .

[14]  Mark Bartlett,et al.  Deterministic and Stochastic Models for Recurrent Epidemics , 1956 .

[15]  Pejman Rohani,et al.  Appropriate Models for the Management of Infectious Diseases , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[16]  B. Bolker,et al.  Chaos and complexity in measles models: a comparative numerical study. , 1993, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[17]  A. J. Hall Infectious diseases of humans: R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 1991. viii + 757 pp. Price £50. ISBN 0-19-854599-1 , 1992 .

[18]  J. Mendlewicz,et al.  PRIMARY ENURESIS AND AFFECTIVE ILLNESS , 1974 .

[19]  D. Cummings,et al.  Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic , 2006, Nature.

[20]  M. Keeling,et al.  Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals , 2007 .

[21]  Roy M. Anderson,et al.  Transmission dynamics of HIV infection , 1987, Nature.