Synchronization in the inhibitory coupled Hodgkin-Huxley neural networks

We consider two small-world networks of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons interacting via inhibitory coupling. We found that synchronization indices (SI) in both networks oscillate periodically in time, so that time intervals of high SI alternate with time intervals of low SI. Depending on the coupling strength, the two coupled networks can be in the regime of either in-phase or anti-phase synchronization. We suppose that the inherent mechanism behind such a behavior lies in the cognitive resource redistribution between neuronal ensembles of the brain.

[1]  S. Yoshizawa,et al.  An Active Pulse Transmission Line Simulating Nerve Axon , 1962, Proceedings of the IRE.

[2]  Vladimir Maksimenko,et al.  Brain-computer interface on the basis of EEG system Encephalan , 2018, Saratov Fall Meeting.

[3]  C. Morris,et al.  Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Bernardo Spagnolo,et al.  Suppression of noise in FitzHugh-Nagumo model driven by a strong periodic signal [rapid communication] , 2005 .

[5]  Z. Duan,et al.  Delay-enhanced coherence of spiral waves in noisy Hodgkin–Huxley neuronal networks , 2008 .

[6]  Z. Duan,et al.  Synchronization transitions on scale-free neuronal networks due to finite information transmission delays. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Explosive synchronization coexists with classical synchronization in the Kuramoto model. , 2016, Chaos.

[8]  Vladimir A. Maksimenko,et al.  Dynamics of functional connectivity in multilayer cortical brain network during sensory information processing , 2019, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[9]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Vladimir A. Maksimenko,et al.  Coherent resonance in the distributed cortical network during sensory information processing , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Vladimir A. Maksimenko,et al.  Neural activity during maintaining a body balance , 2020 .

[12]  M. Kendall.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[13]  Artem Badarin,et al.  Age-Related Distinctions in EEG Signals during Execution of Motor Tasks Characterized in Terms of Long-Range Correlations , 2020, Sensors.

[14]  J. Hindmarsh,et al.  A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  Alexander E. Hramov,et al.  Stimulus classification using chimera-like states in a spiking neural network , 2020 .

[16]  Alexander E. Hramov,et al.  Coherence resonance in stimulated neuronal network , 2018 .

[17]  Vladimir A. Maksimenko,et al.  Functional networks of the brain: from connectivity restoration to dynamic integration , 2020 .

[18]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[19]  J. M. Sausedo-Solorio,et al.  Synchronization in network motifs of delay-coupled map-based neurons , 2017 .

[20]  J. White,et al.  Channel noise in neurons , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  R. FitzHugh.  Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve Membrane. , 1961, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Vadim Grubov,et al.  Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for the Classification of Motor-Related Brain Activity on the Sensor-Level , 2020, Sensors.

[23]  Vladimir A. Maksimenko,et al.  Neural Interactions in a Spatially-Distributed Cortical Network During Perceptual Decision-Making , 2019, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[24]  Alexander E. Hramov,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of the complex multi-scale network , 2018, Saratov Fall Meeting.