Biomimetic and Live Medusae Reveal the Mechanistic Advantages of a Flexible Bell Margin

Flexible bell margins are characteristic components of rowing medusan morphologies and are expected to contribute towards their high propulsive efficiency. However, the mechanistic basis of thrust augmentation by flexible propulsors remained unresolved, so the impact of bell margin flexibility on medusan swimming has also remained unresolved. We used biomimetic robotic jellyfish vehicles to elucidate that propulsive thrust enhancement by flexible medusan bell margins relies upon fluid dynamic interactions between entrained flows at the inflexion point of the exumbrella and flows expelled from under the bell. Coalescence of flows from these two regions resulted in enhanced fluid circulation and, therefore, thrust augmentation for flexible margins of both medusan vehicles and living medusae. Using particle image velocimetry (PIV) data we estimated pressure fields to demonstrate a mechanistic basis of enhanced flows associated with the flexible bell margin. Performance of vehicles with flexible margins was further enhanced by vortex interactions that occur during bell expansion. Hydrodynamic and performance similarities between robotic vehicles and live animals demonstrated that the propulsive advantages of flexible margins found in nature can be emulated by human-engineered propulsors. Although medusae are simple animal models for description of this process, these results may contribute towards understanding the performance of flexible margins among other animal lineages.

[1]  Sean P Colin,et al.  Morphology, swimming performance and propulsive mode of six co-occurring hydromedusae. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  F. Lehmann When wings touch wakes: understanding locomotor force control by wake–wing interference in insect wings , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  Triantafyllou,et al.  Near-body flow dynamics in swimming fish , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  John H. Costello,et al.  Medusan morphospace: phylogenetic constraints, biomechanical solutions, and ecological consequences , 2008 .

[5]  Haibo Dong,et al.  Locomotion with flexible propulsors: I. Experimental analysis of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish , 2006, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[6]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Simulation of flow patterns generated by the hydromedusa Aequorea victoria using an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation , 2009 .

[7]  Colin Smith,et al.  Robojelly bell kinematics and resistance feedback control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[8]  S. Priya,et al.  A bio-inspired shape memory alloy composite (BISMAC) actuator , 2010 .

[9]  Silas Alben,et al.  Optimal flexibility of a flapping appendage in an inviscid fluid , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Colin Smith,et al.  Working principle of bio-inspired shape memory alloy composite actuators , 2010 .

[11]  Shashank Priya,et al.  Modeling of artificial Aurelia aurita bell deformation , 2011 .

[12]  J. Costello,et al.  Flow and feeding by swimming scyphomedusae , 1995 .

[13]  T. Daniel,et al.  Shape, flapping and flexion: wing and fin design for forward flight. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  John H. Costello,et al.  Morphology, fluid motion and predation by the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita , 1994 .

[15]  G. Lauder,et al.  Computational modelling and analysis of the hydrodynamics of a highly deformable fish pectoral fin , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Hirohisa Morikawa,et al.  Bio-mechanisms of Swimming and Flying , 2004, Springer Japan.

[17]  J. Videler,et al.  How the body contributes to the wake in undulatory fish swimming: flow fields of a swimming eel (Anguilla anguilla). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  The effect of fin ray flexural rigidity on the propulsive forces generated by a biorobotic fish pectoral fin , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  John Young,et al.  Details of Insect Wing Design and Deformation Enhance Aerodynamic Function and Flight Efficiency , 2009, Science.

[20]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  PIV-based investigations of animal flight , 2009 .

[21]  Ravi Ramamurti,et al.  Design, Development, and Testing of Flapping Fins with Actively Controlled Curvature for an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle , 2008 .

[22]  Promode R. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Biorobotic insights into how animals swim , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  W. Megill,et al.  The modulus of elasticity of fibrillin-containing elastic fibres in the mesoglea of the hydromedusa Polyorchis penicillatus , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  Haibo Dong,et al.  Locomotion with flexible propulsors: II. Computational modeling of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish , 2006, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[25]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  The numerical comparison of flow patterns and propulsive performances for the hydromedusae Sarsia tubulosa and Aequorea victoria , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Instantaneous pressure and material acceleration measurements using a four-exposure PIV system , 2006 .

[27]  F. Boero,et al.  Kinematic comparison of bell contraction by four species of hydromedusae * , 2006 .

[28]  A. Hedenström,et al.  Bat Flight Generates Complex Aerodynamic Tracks , 2007, Science.

[29]  J. Dabiri,et al.  A wake-based correlate of swimming performance and foraging behavior in seven co-occurring jellyfish species , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  An Exploration of Passive and Active Flexibility in Biolocomotion through Analysis of Canonical Problems , 2008 .

[31]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Numerical experiments on flapping foils mimicking fish-like locomotion , 2005 .

[32]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Understanding the Hydrodynamics of Swimming: From Fish Fins to Flexible Propulsors for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2008 .

[33]  S. Michelin,et al.  Resonance and propulsion performance of a heaving flexible wing , 2009, 0906.2804.

[34]  Morteza Gharib,et al.  Flow patterns generated by oblate medusan jellyfish: field measurements and laboratory analyses , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  Jin Hwan Ko,et al.  Effect of chord flexure on aerodynamic performance of a flapping wing , 2010 .

[36]  T. Daniel,et al.  The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 2989-2997 © 2003 The Company of Biologists Ltd , 2003 .

[37]  Li Wen,et al.  Fuzzy vorticity control of a biomimetic robotic fish using a flapping lunate tail , 2010 .

[38]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Numerical and experimental study of the fluid dynamics of a flapping wing with low order flexibility , 2008 .

[39]  Shashank Priya,et al.  A biomimetic robotic jellyfish (Robojelly) actuated by shape memory alloy composite actuators , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[40]  Lauder,et al.  Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  B. Balachandran,et al.  Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.