Measurement of the blood flow rate and velocity in coronary artery stenosis using intracoronary frequency domain optical coherence tomography: Validation against fractional flow reserve

Objectives The main objective of this study was to assess the blood flow rate and velocity in coronary artery stenosis using intracoronary frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). A correlation between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and FD-OCT derived blood flow velocity is also included in this study. Methods & results A total of 20 coronary stenoses in 15 patients were assessed consecutively by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), FFR and FD-OCT. A percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization system was used in this study which combines wireless FFR measurement and FD-OCT imaging in one platform. Stenoses were labelled severe if FFR ≤ 0.8. Blood flow rate and velocity in each stenosis segment were derived from the volumetric analysis of the FD-OCT pull back images. The FFR value was ≤ 0.80 in 5 stenoses (25%). The mean blood flow rate in severe coronary stenosis (n = 5) was 2.54 ± 0.55 ml/s as compared to 4.81 ± 1.95 ml/s in stenosis with FFR > 0.8 (n = 15). A good and significant correlation between FFR and FD-OCT blood flow velocity in coronary artery stenosis (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) was found. Conclusion The assessment of stenosis severity using FD-OCT derived blood flow rate and velocity has the ability to overcome many limitations of QCA and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative ex vivo and in vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries. , 2009, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[2]  M. Leahy,et al.  Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters. , 2014, Journal of cardiology.

[3]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Kirkeeide,et al.  Coronary obstructions, morphology and physiologic significance , 1991 .

[6]  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Optical coherence tomography assessment of in vivo vascular response after implantation of overlapping bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  E. Regar,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: clinical applications and the evaluation of DES. , 2008, Minerva cardioangiologica.

[8]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .

[9]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[10]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography for stent analysis. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  G S Kassab,et al.  On the design of the coronary arterial tree: a generalization of Murray's law , 1999 .

[13]  Patrizia Presbitero,et al.  Current applications of optical coherence tomography for coronary intervention. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  H. Bezerra,et al.  Utilization of frequency domain optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve to assess intermediate coronary artery stenoses: conciliating anatomic and physiologic information , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1991 .

[17]  E L Bolson,et al.  Experimental Validation of Quantitative Coronary Arteriography for Determining Pressure-Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenosis , 1982, Circulation.

[18]  Patrick W. Serruys,et al.  Tomografía de coherencia óptica de segunda generación en la práctica clínica. La adquisición de datos de alta velocidad muestra una reproducibilidad excelente en pacientes tratados con intervenciones coronarias percutáneas , 2010 .

[19]  Gijs van Soest,et al.  Second-generation optical coherence tomography in clinical practice. High-speed data acquisition is highly reproducible in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[20]  P. Serruys,et al.  Reproducibility of coronary Fourier domain optical coherence tomography: quantitative analysis of in vivo stented coronary arteries using three different software packages. , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  In vivo assessment of high-risk coronary plaques at bifurcations with combined intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[22]  W. Wijns,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Circulation.

[23]  Patrick W. Serruys,et al.  Comparación cuantitativa ex vivo e in vivo de las dimensiones del lumen medidas por tomografía de coherencia óptica y ecografía intravascular en arterias coronarias humanas , 2009 .