An Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Distributed Resource Planning

We study collaborative resource planning arises when resource managers need to coordinate their schedule with a group of internal or external customers. We design a “schedule selection game” where all participating agents state their scheduling preferences via a valuation scheme, and the mechanism selects the Þnal schedule based on the collective input. A majority of distributed coordination approaches in the literature assume that agents have the good will to coorperate and they always provide private information truthfully. Our contention is that without proper incentives, agents may not reveal this information trufully and they may not behave in a way that is aligned with overall system efficiency. We examine the issue of incentive compatibility, and we propose a direct revelation mechanism that implements an optimal schedule under dominant strategies. The mechanism is a modiÞcation of the well known Vickrey-Groves-Clarke mechanism, and we analyze its properties including budget balanceness, and individual rationality. We then illustrate the mechanism using realworld data obtained from an electronics manufacturer.

[1]  T. Groves,et al.  Information, Incentives and the Internalization of Production Externalities , 1974 .

[2]  T. Groves,et al.  Efficient Collective Choice when Compensation is Possible , 1979 .

[3]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[4]  Paula J. Brewer Decentralized computation procurement and computational robustness in a smart market , 1999 .

[5]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[6]  Jean-Jacques Laffont,et al.  On the revelation of preferences for public goods , 1977 .

[7]  C. Plott,et al.  A BINARY CONFLICT ASCENDING PRICE (BICAP) MECHANISM FOR THE DECENTRALIZED ALLOCATION OF THE RIGHT TO USE RAILROAD TRACKS. , 1996 .

[8]  Martin P. Loeb,et al.  Incentives in a Divisionalized Firm , 1979 .

[9]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Distributed rational decision making , 1999 .

[10]  V. Akila,et al.  Information , 2001, The Lancet.

[11]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  Decentralization of responsibility for site decontamination projects: A budget allocation approach , 1995 .

[12]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[13]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[14]  Vijay Krishna,et al.  Efficient Mechanism Design , 1998 .

[15]  S. David Wu,et al.  On combinatorial auction and Lagrangean relaxation for distributed resource scheduling , 1999 .

[16]  K. Arrow The Property Rights Doctrine and Demand Revelation under Incomplete Information**This work was supported by National Science Foundation under Grant No. SOC75-21820 at the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University. , 1979 .

[17]  C. d'Aspremont,et al.  Incentives and incomplete information , 1979 .

[18]  T. Groves,et al.  Incentive Compatible Control of Decentralized Organizations , 1976 .