Building Succesful Rto Teams by using Anp Method

Governments in many countries have increased Research and Technology organizations (RTO) to survive in competitive and highly turbulent environment. RTO team project selection is an important process in these organizations because they basically work as a project and they should be choice team of project systematically. This research developed Analytic Network Process (ANP) method to select team project for Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), and solved this model by Supper Decision software. The result obtained by ANP method show that the second candidate (C2) is the best person that should be selected.

[1]  Connie L. Delisle.  Contemporary Views on Shaping, Developing, and Managing Teams , 2007 .

[2]  Timothy J. Kloppenborg,et al.  The Current State of Project Management Research: Trends, Interpretations, and Predictions , 2002 .

[3]  Ani Raiden,et al.  Balancing employee needs, project requirements and organisational priorities in team deployment , 2006 .

[4]  Gloria Barczak,et al.  Communications patterns of new product development team leaders , 1991 .

[5]  Social Capital Critical Role in Financial Crisis Periods , 2014 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining together: Group theory and group skills, 5th ed. , 1994 .

[7]  Pieter Terlouw,et al.  Improving Performance of Product Development Teams through Managing Polarity , 2001 .

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[9]  Hye Kyung Park,et al.  Virtual enterprise — Information system and networking solution , 1999 .

[10]  Mohsen Varmazyar,et al.  A fuzzy AHP approach for employee recruitment , 2014 .

[11]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes , 2006 .

[12]  Margareta Gällstedt,et al.  Working conditions in projects: perceptions of stress and motivation among project team members and project managers , 2003 .

[13]  S. Balakrishnan,et al.  Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures* Theory and evidence , 1993 .

[14]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects , 2004 .

[15]  Chun-Che Huang,et al.  Novel approach to multi-functional project team formation , 2004 .

[16]  J. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in project implementation: a comparison of construction and R&D projects , 1989 .

[17]  B. Quélin,et al.  Core competencies, R&D management and partnerships , 2000 .

[18]  Michael Finley,et al.  Why teams don't work : what went wrong and how to make it right , 2000 .

[19]  A. Griffin.  PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[20]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations , 2007 .

[21]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Bilateral Collaboration and the Emergence of Innovation Networks , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Qing Li,et al.  Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR , 2008 .

[23]  Charles M. Slem,et al.  Team work in research and development organizations: The characteristics of successful teams , 1995 .

[24]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[26]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Making the Team: A Guide for Managers , 2003 .

[27]  David H. Gobeli,et al.  Significance of project management structure on development success , 1989 .

[28]  Goran D. Putnik,et al.  Virtual Enterprise Integration: Technological and Organizational Perspectives , 2005 .

[29]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[30]  Dov Dvir,et al.  In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors , 1998 .