A method for searching photos on a mobile phone by using the fisheye view technique

Abstract This study evaluates the use of fisheye view to help search for photos in the thumbnail preview on mobile phones with 2 inch diagonal and 3 inch diagonal screens. The factors varied were the number of thumbnails on a screen (array size) and the delay time between selecting the original thumbnail preview and converting it to a fisheye view. On a 2 inch diagonal screen, both user preference and search performance were better on a 3 × 3 array and 4 × 4 array than on a 5 × 5 array. On a 3 inch diagonal screen, 4 × 3 and 5 × 4 arrays were preferred over a 6 × 5 array, but search performance was not statistically different among the arrays. The fisheye view increased search accuracy and speed in 4 × 4 and 5 × 5 arrays on the 2 inch screen, but not in a 3 × 3 array on a 2 inch screen or in any array on a 3 inch screen. Delay time did not affect performance or preference on a 2 inch screen. It is recommended that 16 (a 4 × 4 array) or fewer images should be displayed on a 2 inch screen, and 20 (a 5 × 4 array) or fewer on a 3 inch screen. The delay time should be 0.6 s–1.0 s when using a 4 × 4 array on a 2 inch screen. These results can also be applied to other mobile personal devices with small screens such as digital cameras and PDAs. Relevance to industry The results suggest an effective way of presenting multiple images on a small screen. Also, evaluation method used in this study can be applied in other small display devices as well.

[1]  Michael L. Creech,et al.  FotoFile: a consumer multimedia organization and retrieval system , 1999, CHI '99.

[2]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Visualization of large category map for Internet browsing , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Ramana Rao,et al.  The table lens: merging graphical and symbolic representations in an interactive focus + context visualization for tabular information , 1994, CHI '94.

[4]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Does zooming improve image browsing? , 1999, DL '99.

[5]  James L. Crowley,et al.  Early Experience with the Mediaspace CoMedi , 1998, EHCI.

[6]  Matt Jones,et al.  Improving photo searching interfaces for small-screen mobile computers , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[7]  Justin G. Hollands,et al.  Presenting a graphical network: a comparison of performance using fisheye and scrolling views , 1989 .

[8]  Lyn Bartram,et al.  The continuous zoom: a constrained fisheye technique for viewing and navigating large information spaces , 1995, UIST '95.

[9]  D.A. Carr,et al.  Browsing thumbnails: a comparison of three techniques , 2004, 26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2004..

[10]  Marc Davis,et al.  Photo annotation on a camera phone , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[11]  Kang Ryoung Park,et al.  Measuring the degree of eyestrain caused by watching LCD and PDP devices , 2009 .

[12]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Visual search and visual lobe size: can training on one affect the other? , 2002 .

[13]  Manojit Sarkar,et al.  Graphical fisheye views of graphs , 1992, CHI.

[14]  Jun'ichi Tatemura Dynamic label sampling on fisheye maps for information exploration , 2000, AVI '00.

[15]  Andrew Barrett Implementing RSVP as an Image Browser , 2002 .

[16]  Anand K. Gramopadhye,et al.  The effects of static multiple sources of noise on the visual search component of human inspection , 2004 .

[17]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  Fishnet, a fisheye web browser with search term popouts: a comparative evaluation with overview and linear view , 2004, AVI.

[18]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Evaluating similarity-based visualisations as interfaces for image browsing , 2002 .

[19]  G. W. Furnas,et al.  Generalized fisheye views , 1986, CHI '86.

[20]  Ramana Rao,et al.  A focus+context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies , 1995, CHI '95.

[21]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The document lens , 1993, UIST '93.

[22]  Lyn Bartram,et al.  A continuously variable zoom for navigating large hierarchical networks , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[23]  Thomas Berlage,et al.  FOCUS: the interactive table for product comparison and selection , 1996, UIST '96.

[24]  Philippe Aigrain,et al.  Evaluation of Navigational Links between Images , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Mark Apperley,et al.  Data base navigation: an office environment for the professional , 1982 .

[26]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Visualization methods for personal photo collections: browsing and searching in the PhotoFinder , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest Advances in the Fast Changing World of Multimedia (Cat. No.00TH8532).

[27]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The perspective wall: detail and context smoothly integrated , 1991, CHI.

[28]  Steven M. Drucker,et al.  MediaBrowser: reclaiming the shoebox , 2004, AVI.

[29]  Manojit Sarkar,et al.  Browsing graphs using a fisheye view (abstract) , 1993, CHI '93.

[30]  Celestine A. Ntuen,et al.  Comparison between 2-D & 3-D using an autostereoscopic display: The effects of viewing field and illumination on performance and visual fatigue , 2009 .

[31]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Hierarchical Menu Design: Breadth, Depth, and Task Complexity , 1996 .

[32]  Staffan Björk,et al.  An alternative to scrollbars on small screens , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[33]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Proceedings of the third international conference on human-computer interaction on Designing and using human-computer interfaces and knowledge based systems (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[34]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  PhotoMesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps , 2001, UIST '01.

[35]  L. Tiina Sarjakoski,et al.  Variable-Scale Map For Small-display Cartography , 2002 .