Keynote: Fatigue Hydraulic Fracturing

Abstract In this article, the concept of Fatigue Hydraulic Fracturing (FHF) is described, and its geothermal application is discussed. The basic idea behind fatigue fracturing is to vary the effective stress magnitudes at the fracture tip to optimize fracture initiation and growth. The optimization process can include lowering seismic radiated energy and/or generating fracture networks with various geometry and permeability. Historically, we start referring to results from mechanical laboratory core testing, discrete element simulation of fluid-induced seismicity, and application of cyclic water-fracs at the enhanced geothermal system site Gros-Schonebeck, Germany. Then, an in situ experiment at Aspo Hard Rock Laboratory is summarized to bridge the gap between laboratory core testing and wellbore-size hydraulic fracture treatments in hard rock. Three different fluid injection schemes (continuous, progressive and pulse injection) are tested underground in naturally fractured, crystalline rock mass in terms of associated induced seismicity and permeability performance. Under controlled conditions, hydraulic fractures are extended to about 20–40 m2 in size from a 28 m long, horizontal borehole drilled from a tunnel at 410 m depth. The facture process is mapped by an extensive array of acoustic emission and micro-seismic monitoring instruments. Results from three water-injection tests in Avro granodiorite indicate that the fracture breakdown pressure in tendency becomes lower and the number of fluid-induced seismic events becomes less when continuous, conventional fluid injection is replaced by progressive fluid-injection with several phases of depressurization simulating the fatigue treatment. One reason for this may be that in the dynamic, fatigue treatment a larger fracture process zone is generated compared to the size of the fluid pressurized zone developing during the injection phases into crystalline rock. We see mine-scale tests with hybrid sensor arrays of importance to identify and understand the actual hydraulic fracture mechanisms in hard rock. In addition, the mesoscale data obtained underground allow downscaling to laboratory core results, and upscaling to borehole reservoir stimulation results.

[1]  Jeoung Seok Yoon,et al.  Laboratory Study on Cyclic Hydraulic Fracturing of Pocheon Granite in Korea , 2016 .

[2]  Jeoung Seok Yoon,et al.  Fatigue hydraulic fracturing by cyclic reservoir treatment enhances permeability and reduces induced seismicity , 2013 .

[3]  Jeoung Seok Yoon,et al.  Discrete Element Modelling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation and Dynamic Interaction with Natural Fractures in Hard Rock , 2017 .

[4]  Arno Zang,et al.  Analysis of induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs – An overview , 2014 .

[5]  Robert G. Jeffrey,et al.  Hydraulic fracture growth in naturally fractured rock , 2017 .

[6]  Kevin J. Smart,et al.  Geomechanical modeling of hydraulic fracturing: Why mechanical stratigraphy, stress state, and pre-existing structure matter , 2014 .

[7]  Günter Zimmermann,et al.  Cyclic waterfrac stimulation to develop an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS)—Conceptual design and experimental results , 2010 .

[8]  Daniel Ask New developments in the Integrated Stress Determination Method and their application to rock stress data at the Aspo HRL, Sweden , 2006 .

[9]  Domenico Giardini,et al.  Geothermal quake risks must be faced , 2009, Nature.

[10]  Norman R. Warpinski,et al.  Measurements of Hydraulic-Fracture-Induced Seismicity in Gas Shales , 2012 .

[11]  Arno Zang,et al.  Hydraulic fracture monitoring in hard rock at 410 m depth with an advanced fluid-injection protocol and extensive sensor array , 2017 .

[12]  Arno Zang,et al.  New Insights into Fracture Process through In-Situ Acoustic Emission Monitoring During Fatigue Hydraulic Fracture Experiment in Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory , 2017 .

[13]  H. Niitsuma,et al.  Analysis of acoustic emission from hydraulically induced tensile fracture of rock , 1993 .

[14]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  The Evolution of Stimulated Reservoir Volume during Hydraulic Stimulation of Shale Gas Formations , 2013 .

[15]  Jeoung Seok Yoon,et al.  Numerical investigation on optimized stimulation of intact and naturally fractured deep geothermal reservoirs using hydro-mechanical coupled discrete particles joints model , 2014 .

[16]  Jeoung Seok Yoon,et al.  Numerical Investigation on Stress Shadowing in Fluid Injection-Induced Fracture Propagation in Naturally Fractured Geothermal Reservoirs , 2015, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[17]  W. Ellsworth Injection-Induced Earthquakes , 2013, Science.

[18]  Jeoung Seok Yoon,et al.  Multi-fracturing and Cyclic Hydraulic Stimulation Scenarios to Develop Enhanced Geothermal Systems - Feasibility and Mitigation Strategies to Reduce Seismic Risk , 2015 .

[19]  Jenny Suckale,et al.  Induced Seismicity in Hydrocarbon Fields , 2009 .

[20]  Justin L. Rubinstein,et al.  Myths and Facts on Wastewater Injection, Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhanced Oil Recovery, and Induced Seismicity , 2015 .

[21]  David J. Williams,et al.  Mechanism of rock fatigue damage in terms of fracturing modes , 2012 .

[22]  Ernst Huenges,et al.  Microseismicity induced during fluid-injection: A case study from the geothermal site at Groß Schönebeck, North German Basin , 2010 .

[23]  Peter M. Meier,et al.  Lessons Learned from Basel: New EGS Projects in Switzerland Using Multistage Stimulation and a Probabilistic Traffic Light System for the Reduction of Seismic Risk , 2015 .