Kinking of transversal interface cracks between fiber and matrix

Under loads normal to the direction of the fibers, composites suffer failures that are known as matrix or interfiber failures, typically involving interface cracks between matrix and fibers, the coalescence of which originates macrocracks in the composite. The purpose of this paper is to develop a micromechanical model, using the boundary element method, to generate information aiming to explain and support the mechanism of appearance and propagation of the damage. To this end, a single fiber surrounded by the matrix and with a partial debonding is studied. It has been found that under uniaxial loading transversal to the fibers direction the most significant phenomena appear for semidebonding angles in the interval between 60 deg and 70 deg. After this interval the growth of the crack along the interface is stable (energy release rate (ERR) decreasing) in pure Mode II, whereas it is plausibly unstable in mixed mode (dominated by Mode I for semidebondings smaller than 30 deg) until it reaches the interval. At this interval the direction of maximum circumferential stress at the neighborhood of the crack tip is approximately normal to the applied load. If a crack corresponding to a debonding in this interval leaves the interface and penetrates into the matrix then: (a) the growth through the matrix is unstable in pure Mode I; (b) the value of the ERR reaches a maximum (in comparison with other debonding angles); and (c) the ERR is greater than that released if the crack continued growing along the interface. All this suggests that it is in this interval of semidebondings (60-70 deg) that conditions are most appropriate for an interface crack to kink. Experiments developed by the authors show an excellent agreement between the predictions generated in this paper and the evolution of the damage in an actual composite.

[1]  N. Aravas,et al.  AN ELASTOPLASTIC ANALYSIS OF THE INTERFACE CRACK WITH CONTACT ZONES , 1991 .

[2]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise , 1998 .

[3]  J. Varna,et al.  The effect of crack-face contact on fiber/matrix debonding in transverse tensile loading , 1997 .

[4]  K. Simha,et al.  Interface crack around circular inclusion: SIF, kinking, debonding energetics , 2003 .

[5]  W. Knauss,et al.  Crack Propagation at and Near Bimaterial Interfaces: Linear Analysis , 1994 .

[6]  J. Varna,et al.  The fiber-matrix interface crack — A numerical analysis using Boundary Elements , 1996 .

[7]  M. Toya,et al.  On mode I and mode II energy release rates of an interface crack , 1992 .

[8]  Maria Comninou,et al.  The Interface Crack , 1977 .

[9]  J. Leblond,et al.  Crack kinking from an interface crack with initial contact between the crack lips , 2001 .

[10]  James R. Rice,et al.  Elastic Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Interfacial Cracks , 1988 .

[11]  Fuh-Gwo Yuan,et al.  The curved interfacial crack between dissimilar isotropic solids , 1997 .

[12]  C. Sun,et al.  On strain energy release rates for interfacial cracks in bi-material media , 1987 .

[13]  R. Salganik,et al.  The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks , 1965 .

[14]  E. Gamstedt,et al.  Micromechanisms in tension-compression fatigue of composite laminates containing transverse plies , 1999 .

[15]  Z. Hashin,et al.  A Fatigue Failure Criterion for Fiber Reinforced Materials , 1973 .

[16]  G. C. Sih,et al.  Elastostatic problems of curvilinear cracks in bonded dissimilar materials , 1967 .

[17]  I. Raju,et al.  Convergence of strain energy release rate components for Edge-Delaminated composite laminates , 1988 .

[18]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  On Branched, Interface Cracks , 1981 .

[19]  F. París,et al.  Micromechanical view of failure of the matrix in fibrous composite materials , 2003 .

[20]  A. Evans,et al.  The fracture energy of bimaterial interfaces , 1990 .

[21]  A. H. England.  A Crack Between Dissimilar Media , 1965 .

[22]  F. Erdogan,et al.  On the Crack Extension in Plates Under Plane Loading and Transverse Shear , 1963 .

[23]  L. Berglund,et al.  Transverse single-fibre test for interfacial debonding in composites: 2. Modelling , 1997 .

[24]  L. Berglund,et al.  Transverse single-fibre test for interfacial debonding in composites: 1. Experimental observations , 1997 .

[25]  A. H. England.  An Arc Crack Around a Circular Elastic Inclusion , 1966 .

[26]  M. Toya,et al.  A crack along the interface of a circular inclusion embedded in an infinite solid , 1974 .

[27]  Maria Comninou,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF INTERFACE CRACKS , 1990 .

[28]  K. Liechti,et al.  Asymmetric Shielding in Interfacial Fracture Under In-Plane Shear , 1992 .

[29]  D. Ashkenazi,et al.  A note on fracture criteria for interface fracture , 2000 .

[30]  K. Broberg.  Cracks and Fracture , 1999 .

[31]  F. París,et al.  Boundary Element Method: Fundamentals and Applications , 1997 .

[32]  M. Williams.  The stresses around a fault or crack in dissimilar media , 1959 .

[33]  F. Erdogan,et al.  Stress Distribution in Bonded Dissimilar Materials With Cracks , 1965 .

[34]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Kinking of A Crack Out of AN Interface , 1989 .

[35]  R. Chao,et al.  The fiber-matrix interface crack , 1997 .

[36]  Z. Suo,et al.  Mixed mode cracking in layered materials , 1991 .

[37]  V. Mantič,et al.  Relation between SIF and ERR based measures of fracture mode mixity in interface cracks , 2004 .