Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation

Abstract Stone columns (or granular piles) are increasingly being used for ground improvement, particularly for flexible structures such as road embankments, oil storage tanks, etc. When the stone columns are installed in extremely soft soils, the lateral confinement offered by the surrounding soil may not be adequate to form the stone column. Consequently, the stone columns installed in such soils will not be able to develop the required load-bearing capacity. In such soils, the required lateral confinement can be induced by encasing the stone columns with a suitable geosynthetic. The encasement, besides increasing the strength and stiffness of the stone column, prevents the lateral squeezing of stones when the column is installed even in extremely soft soils, thus enabling quicker and more economical installation. This paper investigates the qualitative and quantitative improvement in load capacity of the stone column by encasement through a comprehensive parametric study using the finite element analysis. It is found from the analyses that the encased stone columns have much higher load carrying capacities and undergo lesser compressions and lesser lateral bulging as compared to conventional stone columns. The results have shown that the lateral confining stresses developed in the stone columns are higher with encasement. The encasement at the top portion of the stone column up to twice the diameter of the column is found to be adequate in improving its load carrying capacity. As the stiffness of the encasement increases, the lateral stresses transferred to the surrounding soil are found to decrease. This phenomenon makes the load capacity of encased columns less dependent on the strength of the surrounding soil as compared to the ordinary stone columns.

[1]  Jie Han,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Earth Platforms over Soft Soil , 2002 .

[2]  S. RAMPELL,et al.  PREDICTED AND OBSERVED PERFORMANCE OF AN OIL TANK FOUNDED ON SOIL-CEMENT COLUMNS IN CLAYEY SOILS , 2003 .

[3]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Numerical modeling of vacuum preloading and field applications , 2004 .

[4]  D. T. Bergado,et al.  Improvement of soft Bangkok clay using vertical geotextile band drains compared with granular piles , 1990 .

[5]  J. M. Duncan,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Stress and Strain in Soils , 1970 .

[6]  S. N. Malarvizhi Load versus Settlement of Claybed stabilized with Stone & Reinforced Stone Columns , 2004 .

[7]  G. Rajasekaran,et al.  Compressibility behaviour of lime-treated marine clay , 2002 .

[8]  N. R. Krishnaswamy,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Investigations on Geocell-Supported Embankments , 2006 .

[9]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils , 1993 .

[10]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  Analysis of field performance of embankments on soft clay deposit with and without PVD-improvement , 2005 .

[11]  M Raithel,et al.  Calculation Models For Dam Foundations With Geotextile Coated Sand Columns , 2000 .

[12]  K. Rajagopal,et al.  Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells , 1999 .

[13]  J. M. O. Hughes,et al.  A field trial of the reinforcing effect of a stone column in soil , 1975 .

[14]  M. S. Atkinson,et al.  CONSOLIDATION OF SOIL USING VERTICAL DRAINS , 1981 .

[15]  Adel Hanna,et al.  Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil , 2005 .

[16]  R. Sharma,et al.  Compressive load response of granular piles reinforced with geogrids , 2004 .