A Unified Approach for Beam-to-Beam Contact

Abstract Existing beam contact formulations can be categorized in point-to-point contact models that consider a discrete contact force at the closest point of the beams, and line-to-line contact models that assume distributed contact forces. In this work, it will be shown that line contact formulations applied to slender beams provide accurate and robust mechanical models in the range of small contact angles, whereas the computational efficiency considerably decreases with increasing contact angles. On the other hand, point contact formulations serve as sufficiently accurate and very efficient models in the regime of large contact angles, while they are not applicable for small contact angles as a consequence of non-unique closest point projections. In order to combine the advantages of these basic formulations, a novel all-angle beam contact ( ABC ) formulation is developed that applies a point contact formulation in the range of large contact angles and a recently developed line contact formulation in the range of small contact angles, the two being smoothly connected by means of a variationally consistent model transition. Based on a stringent analysis, two different transition laws are investigated, optimal algorithmic parameters are suggested and conservation of linear momentum, angular momentum and total energy is shown. All configuration-dependent quantities within the point-, the line- and the transition-contact regime are consistently linearized, thus allowing for their application within implicit time integration schemes. Furthermore, a step size control of the nonlinear solution scheme is proposed that allows for displacement increments per time step that exceed the order of magnitude of the beam cross-section radius. For many standard beam-to-beam contact algorithms, this is the typical limitation concerning possible time step sizes, especially when considering high beam slenderness ratios. Finally, an efficient two-stage contact search based on dynamically adapted search segments is proposed. This algorithm yields in a tight set of potential contact pairs and enables a subdivision into potential point and potential line contact pairs, which is essential in order to fully exploit the efficiency potential of the proposed contact formulation. A series of numerical test cases is analyzed in order to verify the accuracy and consistency of the proposed contact model transition regarding contact force distributions and conservation properties, but also for quantifying the efficiency gains as compared to standard beam contact formulations.

[1]  Przemysøaw Litewka,et al.  The penalty and lagrange multiplier methods in the frictional 3d beam-to-beam contact problem , 2005 .

[2]  Oliver Lieleg,et al.  Rheology of semiflexible bundle networks with transient linkers. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[3]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Generalized Energy–Momentum Method for non-linear adaptive shell dynamics , 1999 .

[4]  Tetsu Uesaka,et al.  Direct simulations of fiber network deformation and failure , 2012 .

[5]  J. C. Simo,et al.  The discrete energy-momentum method. Conserving algorithms for nonlinear elastodynamics , 1992 .

[6]  Przemysław Litewka Enhanced multiple-point beam-to-beam frictionless contact finite element , 2013 .

[7]  Maher Moakher,et al.  Modeling and numerical treatment of elastic rods with frictionless self-contact , 2009 .

[8]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Przemysław Litewka,et al.  Hermite polynomial smoothing in beam-to-beam frictional contact , 2007 .

[10]  Damien Durville,et al.  Finite element simulation of textile materials at mesoscopic scale , 2007 .

[11]  Maher Moakher,et al.  Stability of elastic rods with self-contact , 2014 .

[12]  Damien Durville,et al.  Contact-friction modeling within elastic beam assemblies: an application to knot tightening , 2012 .

[13]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  The interpolation of rotations and its application to finite element models of geometrically exact rods , 2004 .

[14]  Olivier Bruls,et al.  Geometrically exact beam finite element formulated on the special Euclidean group SE(3) , 2014 .

[15]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Director‐based beam finite elements relying on the geometrically exact beam theory formulated in skew coordinates , 2014 .

[16]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[17]  Alexander Konyukhov,et al.  On the solvability of closest point projection procedures in contact analysis: Analysis and solution strategy for surfaces of arbitrary geometry , 2008 .

[18]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Self-contact modeling on beams experiencing loop formation , 2015 .

[19]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  An objective 3D large deformation finite element formulation for geometrically exact curved Kirchhoff rods , 2014 .

[20]  Oscar Gonzalez,et al.  Exact energy and momentum conserving algorithms for general models in nonlinear elasticity , 2000 .

[21]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  A locking-free finite element formulation and reduced models for geometrically exact Kirchhoff rods , 2015 .

[22]  Alexander Popp,et al.  Geometrically Exact Finite Element Formulations for Slender Beams: Kirchhoff–Love Theory Versus Simo–Reissner Theory , 2016, 1609.00119.

[23]  P. Wriggers,et al.  On contact between three-dimensional beams undergoing large deflections , 1997 .

[24]  G. Grason Colloquium: Geometry and optimal packing of twisted columns and filaments , 2014, 1410.7321.

[25]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics , 1999 .

[26]  B. Audoly,et al.  Untangling the mechanics and topology in the frictional response of long overhand elastic knots. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[27]  Giorgio Zavarise,et al.  Contact with friction between beams in 3‐D space , 2000 .

[28]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Numerical method for the simulation of the Brownian dynamics of rod‐like microstructures with three‐dimensional nonlinear beam elements , 2012 .

[29]  Miran Saje,et al.  Finite-element formulation of geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theories based on interpolation of strain measures , 2003 .

[30]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  A comparison of finite elements for nonlinear beams: the absolute nodal coordinate and geometrically exact formulations , 2008 .

[31]  Damien Durville,et al.  Modelling of contact-friction interactions in entangled fibrous materials , 2004 .

[32]  Alexander Konyukhov,et al.  Geometrically exact covariant approach for contact between curves , 2010 .

[33]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Frictional contact between 3D beams , 2002 .

[34]  Przemysław Litewka,et al.  Frictional beam-to-beam multiple-point contact finite element , 2015 .

[35]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Energy‐conserving and decaying Algorithms in non‐linear structural dynamics , 1999 .

[36]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[37]  Y. L. Wang,et al.  Modeling of multi-strand wire ropes subjected to axial tension and torsion loads , 2015 .

[38]  Peter Davies,et al.  Finite element simulation of the mechanical behavior of synthetic braided ropes and validation on a tensile test , 2015 .

[39]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Resolution of sub-element length scales in Brownian dynamics simulations of biopolymer networks with geometrically exact beam finite elements , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[40]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Contact between 3D beams with rectangular cross‐sections , 2002 .

[41]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  An objective finite element approximation of the kinematics of geometrically exact rods and its use in the formulation of an energy–momentum conserving scheme in dynamics , 2002 .

[42]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  A Finite Element Approach for the Line-to-Line Contact Interaction of Thin Beams with Arbitrary Orientation , 2016, ArXiv.

[43]  Damien Durville,et al.  Simulation of the mechanical behaviour of woven fabrics at the scale of fibers , 2010 .

[44]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I , 1985 .