What Does the Future of Automated Driving Mean for Public Transportation?

Public transportation (PT) in combination with other active transportation modes is the key to sustainable cities and a solution against congestion and air pollution. Faced with increasing competition from the private sector and the upcoming technology of automated driving (AD), an acute challenge is ensuring a robust future perspective for PT. There is little research thus far on how AD might affect PT, how it addresses the challenges PT and municipalities face, and how the integration of such vehicles into existing systems can be achieved in the best possible way. In this article, we seek to address this research gap and present the results of a comparative study on stakeholder acceptance and requirements of AD in PT. We aim to find out and relate what various stakeholders (users, local authorities, and PT providers), consider relevant as regards AD in PT to derive hints for favorable applications of AD in PT, and discuss recommendable future development pathways for PT. We applied a qualitative research approach. The study entailed participatory survey instruments and was conducted in two German cities in 2017. Its two-step concept entailed a general discussion as well as identifying specific requirements in the context of three systematically developed use cases that are described in the paper. From the comparative results of the perspectives of users, providers, and municipalities we conclude how different use case types comply with the stakeholder perspectives and discuss what favorable use cases and pathways of PT could look like.

[1]  Tony Flowerdew,et al.  New Methods of Thought and Procedure , 1968 .

[2]  Robert Summers,et al.  New Methods of Thought and Procedure , 1968 .

[3]  U. Kelle,et al.  Vom Einzelfall zum Typus , 1999 .

[4]  Carlos Kölbl.  Review: Udo Kelle & Susann Kluge (1999). Vom Einzelfall zum Typus. Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung , 2000 .

[5]  J. Bergold,et al.  Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion , 2012 .

[6]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[7]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers , 2014 .

[8]  D. Heinrichs,et al.  Automated Driving: How It Could Enter Our Cities and How This Might Af fect Our Mobility Decisions , 2015 .

[9]  Suzanne Childress,et al.  Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore the Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .

[10]  Brice G. Nichols,et al.  Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore Possible Impacts of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .

[11]  Todd Litman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning , 2015 .

[12]  Jun-ichi Imura,et al.  A Vehicle-Intersection Coordination Scheme for Smooth Flows of Traffic Without Using Traffic Lights , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Alireza Talebpour,et al.  Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput , 2016 .

[14]  D. Heinrichs.  Autonomous Driving and Urban Land Use , 2016 .

[15]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Shared Automated Vehicles: Review of Business Models , 2017 .

[16]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[17]  Elias Boutros Khalil,et al.  The impact of private autonomous vehicles on vehicle ownership and unoccupied VMT generation , 2018 .