Health professionals' responses to the introduction of a home telehealth service

An ethnographic (participant observation) study was undertaken of the socio-technical processes involved in the implementation, within a randomized controlled trial, of a home telehealth nursing service for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Ethnographic field notes were taken about technology-related tasks and the interplay between the research team and the 12 nurses who were to use the telehealth equipment. Views of the technology were linked to views of professional self-image and status. The technology was sometimes seen as unhelpful in establishing effective relationships with patients. Considerable work by all participants, over a period of months, was required to develop the technology in ways that minimized the risk to the stability of the specialist service and existing nurse–patient relationships. Our work highlights the complex problems that health professionals encounter when they try to integrate new technologies into routine service delivery. The concerns arising from the interplay of new technology with existing professional practices and relationships go beyond simple issues of training.

[1]  R M Angus,et al.  “Hospital at home” versus hospital care in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prospective randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  M. Sandelowski Visible humans, vanishing bodies, and virtual nursing: complications of life, presence, place, and identity. , 2002, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[3]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[4]  R Wootton,et al.  Telemedicine: a cautious welcome , 1996, BMJ.

[5]  B Kaplan,et al.  People, Organizational, and Social Issues: Evaluation as an exemplar , 2002, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[6]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  Technology and humane nursing care: (ir)reconcilable or invented difference? , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  P. Yellowlees An analysis of why telehealth systems in Australia have not always succeeded , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  A. Haycox,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Telecare , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  F. Mair,et al.  Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[10]  P Jacklin,et al.  Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[11]  M Berg,et al.  The theory of use behind telemedicine: how compatible with physicians' clinical routines? , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[12]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research: Observational methods in health care settings , 1995, BMJ.

[13]  Jafar A Alasad Managing technology in the intensive care unit: the nurses' experience. , 2002, International journal of nursing studies.

[14]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[15]  J. Wyatt Commentary: Telemedicine trials—clinical pull or technology push? , 1996 .

[16]  R. Wootton,et al.  What constitutes success in telehealth? , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.