Seismic assessment of steel frames with the endurance time method

Abstract In the endurance time (ET) method, structures are subjected to a specially designed intensifying ground acceleration function and their performance is judged based on their response at various excitation levels. A range of equivalent intensities can be covered in a single numerical or experimental simulation, thus significantly reducing the computational demand as compared to full nonlinear response-history analyses. The applied excitation intensity at various times has been correlated with those of the scaled ground motions. Response spectra of seven ground motions on stiff soil were used to produce intensifying acceleration functions that at each time window produce a response spectrum that is compatible with the template spectrum and proportionally scale up with time. The drift ratios and plastic hinge rotations compare well with those from ground motions in steel frames with various numbers of stories and bays. The locations of plastic hinges are also predicted quite satisfactorily by ET analysis. The sensitivity of the results to the selection of a particular set of ground motions is also studied.

[1]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Approximate Methods for Estimating Maximum Deformation Demands on Existing Structures , 2005 .

[2]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Evaluation of Drift Demands for the Seismic Performance Assessment of Frames , 2005 .

[3]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi‐linear static pushovers through IDA , 2006 .

[4]  Hossein Tajmir Riahi,et al.  ENDURANCE TIME METHOD: EXERCISE TEST APPLIED TO STRUCTURES , 2009 .

[5]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Performance‐based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach , 2002 .

[6]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Prediction of the median IDA curve by employing a limited number of ground motion records , 2007 .

[7]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[8]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development , 2001 .

[9]  L. Ibarra Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations , 2003 .

[10]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Adaptive Modal Combination Procedure for Nonlinear Static Analysis of Building Structures , 2006 .

[11]  Homayoon E. Estekanchi,et al.  Estimating structural damage of steel moment frames by Endurance Time method , 2008 .

[12]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings , 2002 .

[13]  Ming Wei Liu,et al.  An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings , 2004 .

[14]  Homayoon E. Estekanchi,et al.  Application of Endurance Time method in linear seismic analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands , 2004 .

[16]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Dynamic P-Delta Effects for Flexible Inelastic Steel Structures , 2000 .

[17]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[18]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of Modal and FEMA Pushover Analyses: SAC Buildings , 2004 .

[19]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Statistics of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Estimate of Displacement for Pushover Analysis of Buildings , 2003 .