Characterising a teaching and learning environment conducive to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive

A qualitative study of perception of workload found that it was very weakly related to hours of work. The complex construct was better characterised as being influenced by a broadly conceived teaching and learning environment. It appeared to be possible to encourage students to perform a great deal of high‐quality work, without complaining about excessive workload, by attention to this environment. This hypothesis was tested quantitatively with structural equation modelling with a sample of 3320 undergraduate students at a university in Hong Kong. The hypothesised model had nine factors of the teaching and learning environment grouped under three higher‐order latent variables: teaching, teacher–student relationships and student–student relationships which have influences on perceived workload. The model showed a good fit to the data, confirming the hypothesis that attention to the teaching and learning environment can spur students to work hard without feeling overly stressed. The questionnaire could be used as a diagnostic tool to discover which aspects of the environment need attention.

[1]  Leslie A. Hayduk.  Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advances , 1987 .

[2]  D. Kember,et al.  Avoider and Engager Approaches by Out-of-Class Groups: The Group Equivalent to Individual Learning Approaches. , 2004 .

[3]  P. Bentler.  MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS WITH LATENT VARIABLES: CAUSAL MODELING , 1980 .

[4]  D. Kember,et al.  Engager and avoider behaviour in types of activities performed by out-of-class learning groups , 2004 .

[5]  P. Bentler,et al.  Model Modification in Covariance Structure Modeling: A Comparison among Likelihood Ratio, Lagrange Multiplier, and Wald Tests. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  David Kember,et al.  Influences upon Students’ Perceptions of Workload , 1998 .

[7]  D. Kember.  Interpreting Student Workload and the Factors Which Shape Students' Perceptions of Their Workload. , 2004 .

[8]  N. Schmitt.  Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. , 1996 .

[9]  David Kember,et al.  Influence of the Curriculum and Learning Environment on Group Learning Approaches Outside the Classroom , 2003 .

[10]  David Kember,et al.  An examination of the interrelationships between workload, study time, learning approaches and academic outcomes , 1996 .

[11]  Carmel McNaught,et al.  Excellent University Teaching , 2006 .

[12]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[13]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes , 1991 .

[14]  David Kember,et al.  Learning approaches, study time and academic performance , 1995 .

[15]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[16]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[17]  David Kember,et al.  The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities , 2005 .

[18]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[20]  B. Byrne.  Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[21]  David Kember,et al.  Comparability of Data Gathered from Evaluation Questionnaires on Paper and Through the Internet , 2005 .

[22]  M. Dunkin,et al.  Award-winning university teachers' concepts of teaching , 1992 .

[23]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .