The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall.

Attentional demands and recall for stories that differed in rated interest were examined. More interesting stories required fewer attentional resources for comprehension than did less interesting stories (Experiment 1). Overall recall did not differ across story interest, but story interest did interact with type of encoding in terms of recall levels (Experiment 2). Relational encoding improved recall for low-interest stories but not high-interest stories; the reverse pattern was obtained with a manipulation encouraging extensive processing of the individual propositions. We suggest that interesting stories free up resources for relatively optional organizational processing of the text elements, thereby rendering additional relational processing redundant (for recall). Less interesting stories require more resources to keep attention focused on encoding the individual propositions, thereby rendering additional proposition-specific processing redundant.

[1]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[2]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[4]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning. , 1979 .

[5]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[6]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[8]  A. Graesser,et al.  Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. , 1980 .

[9]  Randolph K. Cirilo.  Referential coherence and text structure in story comprehension , 1981 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson.  Allocation of Attention during Reading. , 1982 .

[11]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  That's Important But is it Interesting? Two Factors in Text Processing , 1982 .

[12]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Stories Are to Entertain: A Structural-Affect Theory of Stories. Technical Report No. 265. , 1982 .

[13]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[14]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The role of elaborative and schema processes in story memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding difficulty and memory: toward a unifying theory , 1986 .

[16]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Long‐term prose retention: Is an organizational schema sufficient? , 1987 .

[17]  Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.  Effect of Interest on Attention and Learning , 1988 .

[18]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. , 1988 .

[19]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt,et al.  Learning and comprehension of text , 1988 .

[20]  C. Fletcher,et al.  Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts , 1988 .

[21]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[22]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  The Effects of Causal Structure on the Comprehension of Narratives: Implications for Education. , 1989 .

[23]  C. S. White,et al.  Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children , 1989 .

[24]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Material-appropriate processing: A contextualist approach to reading and studying strategies , 1989 .

[25]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning , 1990 .

[26]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing , 1990 .

[27]  Suzanne E. Wade,et al.  Effects of Importance and Interest on Recall of Biographical Text , 1990 .

[28]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. , 1991 .

[29]  P. Waddill.  The mental representation of narrative: All stories are not created equal , 1992 .

[30]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts , 1992 .

[31]  K. Ann Renninger,et al.  Interest, Learning and Development , 1992 .

[32]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Seduction of the strategic reader: effects of interest on strategies and recall , 1993 .

[33]  Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.  The Selective Attention Strategy as a Time-Dependent Phenomenon , 1994 .

[34]  M. McDaniel,et al.  What makes folk tales unique: content familiarity, causal structure, scripts, or superstructures? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Role Of Interest In Learning And Development , 1994 .

[36]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The Effects of Test Expectancy on Processing and Memory of Prose. , 1994 .

[37]  S. Tobias.  Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning , 1994 .

[38]  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. , 2000 .