Missing Photos, Suffering Withdrawal, or Finding Freedom? How Experiences of Social Media Non-Use Influence the Likelihood of Reversion

This article examines social media reversion, when a user intentionally ceases using a social media site but then later resumes use of the site. We analyze a convenience sample of survey data from people who volunteered to stay off Facebook for 99 days but, in some cases, returned before that time. We conduct three separate analyses to triangulate on the phenomenon of reversion: simple quantitative predictors of reversion, factor analysis of adjectives used by respondents to describe their experiences of not using Facebook, and statistical topic analysis of free-text responses. Significant factors predicting either increased or decreased likelihood of reversion include, among others, prior use of Facebook, experiences associated with perceived addiction, issues of social boundary negotiation such as privacy and surveillance, use of other social media, and friends’ reactions to non-use. These findings contribute to the growing literature on technology non-use by demonstrating how social media users negotiate, both with each other and with themselves, among types and degrees of use and non-use.

[1]  C. S. Andreassen,et al.  Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale , 2012, Psychological reports.

[2]  Laura Portwood-Stacer,et al.  Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: The performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention , 2013, New Media Soc..

[3]  Alice E. Marwick.  The Public Domain: Social Surveillance In Everyday Life DRAFT VERSION , 2011 .

[4]  Jed R. Brubaker,et al.  Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr , 2016, New Media Soc..

[5]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Shanping Li,et al.  Where is the crowd , 2017 .

[8]  Marco Rosa,et al.  Four degrees of separation , 2011, WebSci '12.

[9]  Martin Voracek,et al.  Who Commits Virtual Identity Suicide? Differences in Privacy Concerns, Internet Addiction, and Personality Between Facebook Users and Quitters , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI , 2009, OZCHI.

[11]  Donald A. Jackson.  STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[12]  Madeline E. Smith,et al.  Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences , 2013, CHI.

[13]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[14]  D. Lyon.  Surveillance Studies: An Overview , 2007 .

[15]  Zizi Papacharissi.  We Have Always Been Social , 2015 .

[16]  Shion Guha,et al.  Do Birds of a Feather Watch Each Other?: Homophily and Social Surveillance in Location Based Social Networks , 2015, CSCW.

[17]  Johanna Uotinen,et al.  Involvement in (the Information) Society - The Joensuu Community Resource Centre Netcafé , 2003, New Media Soc..

[18]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Users and nonusers: interactions between levels of adoption and social capital , 2013, CSCW '13.

[19]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  L. Humphreys.  Who's Watching Whom? A Study of Interactive Technology and Surveillance , 2011 .

[21]  David G. Rand,et al.  Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses , 2014, American Journal of Political Science.

[22]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[23]  S. Wyatt.  Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the Internet , 2003 .

[24]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[25]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world , 2003, CHI '03.

[26]  Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck,et al.  Giving up Twitter for Lent: how and why we take breaks from social media , 2014, CHI.

[27]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[28]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[29]  Zeynep Tufekcioglu.  Grooming, gossip, facebook and myspace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won't assimilate? , 2008 .

[30]  J. Barlow.  The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains , 2010 .

[31]  Shion Guha,et al.  Can you see me now?: location, visibility and the management of impressions on foursquare , 2013, MobileHCI '13.

[32]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Being watched or being special: how I learned to stop worrying and love being monitored, surveilled, and assessed , 2006, CHI.

[33]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[34]  J. Krige.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[35]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Scott D. Mainwaring,et al.  Infrastructures and Their Discontents: Implications for Ubicomp , 2004, UbiComp.

[37]  Alice E. Marwick.  The Public Domain: Surveillance in Everyday Life , 2012 .

[38]  Ellie Harmon,et al.  Stories of the Smartphone in everyday discourse: conflict, tension & instability , 2013, CHI.

[39]  Mikhail J. Atallah,et al.  Internet addiction: Meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006 , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..