Preventive strategies for group B streptococcal and other bacterial infections in early infancy: cost effectiveness and value of information analyses

Objective To determine the cost effectiveness of strategies for preventing neonatal infection with group B streptococci and other bacteria in the UK and the value of further information from research. Design Use of a decision model to compare the cost effectiveness of prenatal testing for group B streptococcal infection (by polymerase chain reaction or culture), prepartum antibiotic treatment (intravenous penicillin or oral erythromycin), and vaccination during pregnancy (not yet available) for serious bacterial infection in early infancy across 12 maternal risk groups. Model parameters were estimated using multi-parameter evidence synthesis to incorporate all relevant data inputs. Data sources 32 systematic reviews were conducted: 14 integrated results from published studies, 24 involved analyses of primary datasets, and five included expert opinion. Main outcomes measures Healthcare costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results Current best practice (to treat only high risk women without prior testing for infection) and universal testing by culture or polymerase chain reaction were not cost effective options. Immediate extension of current best practice to treat all women with preterm and high risk term deliveries without testing (11% treated) would result in substantial net benefits. Currently, addition of culture testing for low risk term women, while treating all preterm and high risk term women, would be the most cost effective option (21% treated). If available in the future, vaccination combined with treating all preterm and high risk term women and no testing for low risk women would probably be marginally more cost effective and would limit antibiotic exposure to 11% of women. The value of information is highest (�67m) if vaccination is included as an option. Conclusions Extension of current best practice to treat all women with preterm and high risk term deliveries is readily achievable and would be beneficial. The choice between adding culture testing for low risk women or vaccination for all should be informed by further research. Trials to evaluate vaccine efficacy should be prioritised.

[1]  T. Colbourn,et al.  Prenatal screening and treatment strategies to prevent group B streptococcal and other bacterial infections in early infancy: cost-effectiveness and expected value of information analyses. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[2]  C. Baker,et al.  Prospects for prevention of childhood infections by maternal immunization , 2006, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[3]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Multiparameter evidence synthesis in epidemiology and medical decision‐making: current approaches , 2006 .

[4]  W. Tarnow-Mordi,et al.  The effect of prepartum antibiotics on the type of neonatal bacteraemia: insights from the MRC ORACLE trials , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  Karl Claxton,et al.  A Pilot Study of Value of Information Analysis to Support Research Recommendations for NICE , 2005 .

[6]  M. Weinstein,et al.  The projected health benefits of maternal group B streptococcal vaccination in the era of chemoprophylaxis. , 2005, Vaccine.

[7]  R. Feldman,et al.  Vaccination against Group B streptococcus , 2005, Expert review of vaccines.

[8]  A E Ades,et al.  Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  R. Gilbert Prenatal screening for group B streptococcal infection: gaps in the evidence. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  M. Brownstein PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) , 2004 .

[11]  D. Money,et al.  The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. , 2004, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[12]  Stephanie Schrag,et al.  Prevention of Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease Revised Guidelines from CDC , 2002 .

[13]  H. Davies,et al.  Perinatal Antibiotic Usage and Changes in Colonization and Resistance Rates of Group B Streptococcus and Other Pathogens , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  A. Schuchat,et al.  PREVENTION OF PERINATAL GROUP B STREPTOCOCCAL DISEASE , 2002 .

[15]  S. Kenyon,et al.  Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[16]  K Claxton,et al.  The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. , 1999, Journal of health economics.

[17]  V Hasselblad,et al.  Meta-analytic Tools for Medical Decision Making: A Practical Guide , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  B. O'brien,et al.  Willingness to Pay , 1994, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[19]  M Johannesson,et al.  On the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1993, Journal of health economics.