Learning cross-protocol radiomics and deep feature standardization from CT images of texture phantoms

Radiomics has shown promising results in several medical studies, yet it suffers from a limited discrimination and informative capability as well as a high variation and correlation with the tomographic scanner types, CT (Computer Tomography) scanner producers, pixel spacing, acquisition protocol and reconstruction parameters. This paper introduces a new method to transform image features in order to improve their stability across scanner producers and scanner models. This method is based on a two-layer neural network that can learn a non-linear standardization transformation of various types of features including hand-crafted and deep features. A publicly available database of phantom images with ground truth is used where the same physical phantom was scanned on 17 different CT scanners. In this setting, variations in extracted features are representative of true physio-pathological tissue changes in the scanned patients, so harmonized between scanner producers and models. The recent success of radiomics studies has often been restricted to relatively controlled environments. In order allow for comparing data of several hospitals produced with a larger variety of scanner producers and models as well as with several protocols, features standardization seems necessary to keep results comparable.

[1]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[3]  Steffen Löck,et al.  Image biomarker standardisation initiative - feature definitions , 2016, ArXiv.

[4]  Samuel H. Hawkins,et al.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[5]  R. Gillies,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Radiomic Features: A Systematic Review , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Laurence Court,et al.  Harmonizing the pixel size in retrospective computed tomography radiomics studies , 2017, PloS one.

[7]  R. Gillies,et al.  The biology underlying molecular imaging in oncology: from genome to anatome and back again. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[8]  Samuel H. Hawkins,et al.  Predicting malignant nodules by fusing deep features with classical radiomics features , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[9]  Paul F. Whelan,et al.  Using filter banks in Convolutional Neural Networks for texture classification , 2016, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Wei Cao,et al.  Deep Learning based Radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Andriy Fedorov,et al.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. , 2017, Cancer research.

[13]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[15]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  How reliable are texture measurements? , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[17]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Repeatability of Radiomic Features in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [18F]FDG-PET/CT Studies: Impact of Reconstruction and Delineation , 2016, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[18]  Iasonas Kokkinos,et al.  Deep Filter Banks for Texture Recognition, Description, and Segmentation , 2015, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[20]  Jiazhou Wang,et al.  Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? , 2016, Tomography.

[21]  M. Soussan,et al.  A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[23]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters , 2010, Acta oncologica.