Cognitive levels of instruction and student performance in college of agriculture courses

s. The Translation level includes six categories of behavior that indicate the use of knowledge by restating facts in a different form or by giving examples. The Interpretation level also includes six categories. This level focuses upon thought which is indicative of an understanding of relationships (i.e. giving reasons). Table 2 Comparison of the Cognitive Levels of Teaching and Learning Included in Bloom's Taxonomy and the Florida Taxonomy of Cognitive Behavior Bloom's Taxonomy Florida Taxonomy of Cognitive Behavior Knowledge Knowledge Comprehension Translation Interpretation Application Application Analysis Analysis Synthesis Synthesis Evaluation Evaluation 43 The remaining three levels of the FTCB are Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. They include eleven, nine, and two categories of behavior respectively and these categories are comparable to those specified by Bloom et al. (1956). Appendix B, which is an example of the actual form used, provides a complete listing of the levels of cognition and specific categories associated with each in the FTCB. The FTCB and a manual describing its use were developed by Brown, Ober, Soar, and Webb (Simon and Boyer, 1974). This instrument was tested and used in a number of studies including those of Brown (1968), Bane (1969), Brown et al. (1969), Wood (1969), Brown and Bane (1970), and Brown and Webb (1973). The validity of the FTCB is based upon its direct derivation from Bloom's Taxonomy. Consequently, it is argued that the FTCB can be considered valid in light of the support generally given to Bloom's Taxonomy as a means of identifying behaviors in the various levels of cognition. Reliability of the FTCB is dependent upon the raters' utilization of the instrument. In this study, a single rater was involved in assessment of course experiences using the FTCB. The rater received training from a researcher with extensive experience in the use of the FTCB. Training involved an explanation of the use of the instrument followed by practice using video taped teaching episodes. Initial practice sessions were conducted with the trainer present to provide guidance in the use of the instrument.

[1]  James R. Davis Teaching Strategies for the College Classroom , 2019 .

[2]  Norris M. Sanders Classroom Questions: What Kinds? , 1966 .

[3]  W. McKeachie,et al.  Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher. , 1986 .

[4]  Ned A. Flanders,et al.  Analyzing Teaching Behavior , 1970 .

[5]  F. Schrag Are There Levels of Thinking? , 1989, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching: A Review. , 1970 .

[7]  Irwin A. Willson Changes in Mean Levels of Thinking in Grades 1-8 Through Use of an Interaction Analysis System Based on Bloom's Taxonomy. , 1973 .

[8]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  The Use of Questions in Teaching , 1970 .

[9]  C. Ormell,et al.  Bloom's Taxonomy and the Objectives of Education , 1974 .

[10]  P. Pintrich A Process-Oriented View of Student Motivation and Cognition. , 1988 .

[11]  MEASUREMENT OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES1 , 1964 .

[12]  The Evaluation of Learning , 1969, British journal of medical education.

[13]  Francis P. Hunkins The Influence of Analysis and Evaluation Questions on Achievement and Critical Thinking in Sixth Grade Social Studies. Final Report. , 1968 .

[14]  Robert H. Ennis A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilitities , 1987 .

[15]  E. Furst Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain: Philosophical and Educational Issues , 1981 .

[16]  P. Hirst,et al.  Knowledge and the Curriculum , 1977 .

[17]  A Study of the Relationship of Classroom Questions and Social Studies Achievement of Second-Grade Children. , 1972 .

[18]  Daryl G. Smith College Classroom Interactions and Critical Thinking. , 1977 .

[19]  R. W. Fairbrother,et al.  The Reliability of Teachers’ Judgement of the Abilities Being Tested by Multiple Choice Items , 1975 .

[20]  Francis P. Hunkins Questioning strategies and techniques , 1972 .

[21]  J. Gallagher Analyses of Teacher Classroom Strategies Associated with Student Cognitive and Affective Performance. Final Report. , 1968 .

[22]  Nancy Roberts Further Verification of Bloom’s Taxonomy , 1976 .

[23]  B. Brown The experimental mind in education , 1968 .

[24]  J. McPeck Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: A Reply to Ennis , 1990 .

[25]  Jamie Cano,et al.  Assessment of the level of cognition of instruction and student performance in selected production agriculture programs in Ohio , 1988 .

[26]  Thomas A. Angelo,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques. A Handbook for Faculty. , 1988 .