Different perceptions of adaptation to climate change: a mental model approach applied to the evidence from expert interviews

We argue that differences in the perception and governance of adaptation to climate change and extreme weather events are related to sets of beliefs and concepts through which people understand the environment and which are used to solve the problems they face (mental models). Using data gathered in 31 in-depth interviews with adaptation experts in Europe, we identify five basic stakeholder groups whose divergent aims and logic can be related to different mental models they use: advocacy groups, administration, politicians, researchers, and media and the public. Each of these groups uses specific interpretations of climate change and specifies how to deal with climate change impacts. We suggest that a deeper understanding and follow-up of the identified mental models might be useful for the design of any stakeholder involvement in future climate impact research processes. It might also foster consensus building about adequate adaptation measures against climate threats in a society.

[1]  Tori L. Jennings.  Adapting to Climate Change: Exploring the invisibility of local knowledge in decision-making: the Boscastle Harbour flood disaster , 2009 .

[2]  Claudia R Binder,et al.  System Perspectives of Experts and Farmers Regarding the Role of Livelihood Assets in Risk Perception: Results from the Structured Mental Model Approach , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  D. Decker,et al.  Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management , 2003 .

[4]  J. Forrester.  Counterintuitive behavior of social systems , 1971 .

[5]  J. Tàbara,et al.  Culture as trigger for sustainability transition in the water domain: the case of the Spanish water policy and the Ebro river basin , 2008 .

[6]  T. Downing,et al.  Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation , 2007 .

[7]  D. McEvoy,et al.  Framing adaptation to climate-related extreme events , 2010 .

[8]  D. North,et al.  Elements of Reason: Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions , 1994 .

[9]  Achim Maas,et al.  Assessing the susceptibility of societies to droughts: a political science perspective , 2008 .

[10]  Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer,et al.  Stakeholder Views on Flood Risk Management in Hungary's Upper Tisza Basin , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Arild Vatn,et al.  Institutions And The Environment , 2005 .

[12]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives , 2006 .

[13]  Mark Schafer,et al.  Individual and Group Decision Making , 2011 .

[14]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[15]  K. O’Brien,et al.  Adapting to Climate Change: Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation? , 2009 .

[16]  Wei Li,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Dirk T. G. Rübbelke,et al.  Financial adaptation to disaster risk in the European Union , 2010 .

[18]  N. M. Morris,et al.  On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models , 1986 .

[19]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[20]  J. Sterman.  Risk Communication on Climate: Mental Models and Mass Balance , 2008, Science.

[21]  Linking Perceptions and Water Management: Reflections from Cyprus , 2009 .

[22]  David Greathead,et al.  When mental models go wrong: co-occurrences in dynamic, critical systems , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Marco Bindi,et al.  A risk management approach for assessing adaptation to changing flood and drought risks in Europe , 2010 .

[24]  Lyn Richards,et al.  Using NVIVO in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[25]  M. Meuser,et al.  ExpertInneninterviews - vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion , 1991 .

[26]  I. Lorenzoni,et al.  Conceptual and practical barriers to adaptation: vulnerability and responses to heat waves in the UK , 2009 .

[27]  K. O’Brien,et al.  Do values subjectively defi ne the limits to climate change adaptation ? , 2009 .

[28]  M. Meuser,et al.  ExpertInneninterviews — vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht , 2002 .

[29]  J. Forrester.  System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years , 1993 .

[30]  E. Fuentes,et al.  Environmental perception of mountain ecosystems in central Chile: An exploratory study , 1983 .

[31]  Shosuke Suzuki,et al.  A Survey of Perception, Knowledge, Awareness, and attitude in Regard to Environmental Problems in a Sample of two Different Social Groups in Jakarta, Indonesia , 2001 .

[32]  Klaus Kraimer,et al.  Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung : Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen , 1991 .

[33]  D. McEvoy,et al.  Adaptation and mitigation in urban areas: synergies and conflicts , 2006 .

[34]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/casp.774 Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management , 2022 .

[35]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .