The effect of local population dynamics on patterns of isolation by distance

Abstract Isolation-by-distance (IBD) is a widely used model explaining population structure and how gene flow decreases with increasing distance. It is biologically intuitive that populations which rarely exchange individuals should drift apart genetically. However, the model is based on the assumptions that populations are large, equal in size and stable over time — conditions that are unlikely to occur in natural conditions. The model has been challenged in the past, for example, in the light of metapopulations or variance in reproductive success. However, an appraisal of the assumption of a large and stable population size per se is lacking. We investigate the robustness of the results concerning IBD patterns when smaller and fluctuating population sizes, or differences in population size are allowed. Through computer simulations we show that allowing for different population sizes and random fluctuations lead to unpredictable patterns regarding the results concerning gene flow and IBD. A pattern of IBD could be the result of high gene flow or no gene flow at all, depending on how populations differ in size and how they fluctuate. Adding environmental noise (white, red and blue noise corresponding to random, positive and negative autocorrelation respectively) gives even more unpredictable results concerning patterns of IBD. Our results have important implications for genetic and conservation research. Interpreting an IBD pattern, or lack thereof, is not as easy as earlier thought and needs to be more thoroughly explored.

[1]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[2]  M. Björklund,et al.  CRYPTIC BARRIERS TO DISPERSAL WITHIN A LAKE ALLOW GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF EURASIAN PERCH , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  Per Lundberg,et al.  Noise colour and the risk of population extinctions , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  G. E. Woolfenden,et al.  Contrasting genetic structures in sister species of North American scrub-jays , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  M. Björklund,et al.  Genetic and morphological divergence reveals local subdivision of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) , 2009 .

[6]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Environmental forcing and genetic differentiation in subdivided populations , 2008 .

[7]  ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN THE ATLANTIC COD, GADUS MORHUA, AT LARGE AND SMALL GEOGRAPHIC SCALES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The effective size of a subdivided population. , 1997, Genetics.

[9]  T. Sharbel,et al.  Genetic isolation by distance in Arabidopsis thaliana: biogeography and postglacial colonization of Europe , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[10]  E. Ranta,et al.  Competition enhances spatial genetic differentiation , 2009 .

[11]  P. Yodzis,et al.  THE COLOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE , 2004 .

[12]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[13]  O. Gaggiotti,et al.  INVITED REVIEW: What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[14]  A. Templeton,et al.  CORRELATION OF PAIRWISE GENETIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTANCE MEASURES: INFERRING THE RELATIVE INFLUENCES OF GENE FLOW AND DRIFT ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENETIC VARIABILITY , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  J. Höglund,et al.  Non‐gradual variation in colour morphs of the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio: genetic and geographical isolation suggest a role for selection in maintaining polymorphism , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[16]  F. Molina-Freaner,et al.  The genetic structure of a columnar cactus with a disjunct distribution: Stenocereus gummosus in the Sonoran desert , 2003, Heredity.

[17]  R. Black,et al.  Neighbourhood size and the importance of barriers to gene flow in an intertidal snail , 1995, Heredity.

[18]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE AND HIERARCHICAL GENETIC DIVERSITY IN THE BROOK CHARR, SALVELINUS FONTINALIS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  F. Rousset Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations (MPB-40) , 2004 .

[20]  F. Rousset Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. , 1997, Genetics.

[21]  E. Ranta,et al.  Ecology of Populations: References , 2005 .

[22]  T. Burke,et al.  Isolation by distance and gene flow in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) at both a local and broad scale , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[23]  M. Whitlock,et al.  Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST≠1/(4Nm+1) , 1999, Heredity.

[24]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Genetic structure of Siberian lemmings (Lemmus sibiricus) in a continuous habitat: large patches rather than isolation by distance , 2001, Heredity.