Media audiences and the game of controversy

Abstract This article looks at the atmosphere of controversy or the perfume of scandal around reality TV. In order to grasp the feeling of controversy, we first look at the social and moral issues treated by reality programmes, where we try to introduce some positions in the overall reality TV debate. In a second step we argue that the controversial nature may reside in the intentional production or simulation of a (possible) moral panic, where we bring in recent reconfigurations about this critical sociological concept. One of the ideas here is that the old moral-panic model — what can be seen as a spiral effect produced by the interaction of the media, public opinion, interest groups, moral guardians and the authorities — needs to be adapted to a postmodern (media) environment. In this context we make a distinction between the moral- and media-panic concept. A third, more empirically based step in the attempt to understand the perfume of scandal deals with an audience study on how young people perceive new factual television and reality TV, including ‘extreme’ or more controversial forms of it.

[1]  John Ellis,et al.  Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty , 2000 .

[2]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[3]  J. Langer,et al.  Tabloid Television: Popular Journalism and the 'Other News' , 1997 .

[4]  Jostein Gripsrud Television and Common Knowledge , 1999 .

[5]  Bill Nichols Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary , 1992 .

[6]  Peter Lunt,et al.  Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate , 1993 .

[7]  Richard Kilborn,et al.  `How Real Can You Get?': Recent Developments in `Reality' Television , 1994 .

[8]  meaning over time. , 2002 .

[9]  Ib Bondebjerg Public discourse/private fascination: hybridization in `true-life-story' genres , 1996 .

[10]  P. Charaudeau,et al.  La parole confisquée : un genre télévisuel : le talk show , 1997 .

[11]  J. Staiger Bad Women: Regulating Sexuality in Early American Cinema , 1995 .

[12]  K. Richardson,et al.  Worlds in Common?: Television Discourses in a Changing Europe , 1999 .

[13]  J. Kitzinger Media templates: patterns of association and the (re)construction of meaning over time , 2000 .

[14]  M. Gurevitch,et al.  Mass Media and Society , 1992 .

[15]  John Clarke,et al.  Policing the Crisis: , 2018, Essential Essays, Volume 1.

[16]  J. Springhall Youth, Popular Culture and Moral Panics , 1998 .

[17]  Anne Jerslev Realism and 'reality' in film and media , 2002 .

[18]  Bill Nichols,et al.  Blurred Boundaries: Questions of Meaning in Contemporary Culture , 1994 .

[19]  Stanley H. Cohen Folk Devils and Moral Panics , 1972 .

[20]  N. ben-yehuda The Politics and Morality of Deviance: Moral Panics, Drug Abuse, Deviant Science, and Reversed Stigmatization , 1989 .

[21]  N. R. Johnson,et al.  Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance , 1996 .

[22]  Daniël Biltereyst Worlds in common? Television discourse in a changing Europe. by Richardson K, Meinhof UH. , 2000 .

[23]  Dominique Mehl La télévision compassionnelle , 1994 .

[24]  S. Bird,et al.  News We Can Use: An Audience Perspective on the Tabloidisation of News in the United States , 1998 .

[25]  Ronald Hitzler,et al.  Literaturbesprechung zu: Beck, Ulrich: Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkarnp 1986 , 1988 .

[26]  U. Beck Risikogesellschaft auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne , 1986 .

[27]  R. Lane The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies , 2000 .