Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations

We develop a differentiated productivity model of knowledge sharing in organizations proposing that different types of knowledge have different benefits for task units. In a study of 182 sales teams in a management consulting company, we find that sharing codified knowledge in the form of electronic documents saved time during the task, but did not improve work quality or signal competence to clients. In contrast, sharing personal advice improved work quality and signaled competence, but did not save time. Beyond the content of the knowledge, process costs in the form of document rework and lack of advisor effort negatively affected task outcomes. These findings dispute the claim that different types of knowledge are substitutes for each other, and provide a micro-foundation for understanding why and how a firm's knowledge capabilities translate into performance of knowledge work. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Teece.  Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[2]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[3]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[4]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[5]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[6]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[7]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[8]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[9]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[10]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[11]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Databases: Theory, Data, and Implications , 1990 .

[12]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[13]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[14]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[15]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[16]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[17]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[18]  Joel Podolny.  Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[19]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[20]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[21]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[23]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[24]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[25]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[26]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[27]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[28]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[29]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[30]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[31]  D. Foray,et al.  The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 1997 .

[32]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[33]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Keeping Organizational Secrets: Protective Institutional Mechanisms and their Costs , 1997 .

[34]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[35]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing knowledge in global service firms: Centers of excellence , 1998 .

[36]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[37]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[38]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[39]  Alexandre B. Lopes,et al.  The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[40]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The Economics Of Knowledge: The Debate About Codification And Tacit Knowledge , 2000 .

[41]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  Organizational Learning and the Transfer of Knowledge: An Investigation of Quality Improvement , 2000 .

[42]  Kevin McCabe,et al.  Avoiding Competence Substitution Through Knowledge Sharing , 2000 .

[43]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Organizational Learning About New International Markets: Exploring the Internal Transfer of Local Market Knowledge , 2000 .

[44]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism , 2000 .

[45]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[46]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[47]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations , 2001 .

[48]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[49]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Creating and Transferring Knowledge for Productivity Improvement in Factories , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[50]  B. Lev.  Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting , 2001 .

[51]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Competing for Attention in Knowledge Markets: Electronic Document Dissemination in a Management Consulting Company , 2001 .

[52]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[53]  Martin Schulz,et al.  Pathways of Relevance: Exploring Inflows of Knowledge into Subunits of Multinational Corporations , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[54]  A. Werr,et al.  Exploring Management Consulting Firms as Knowledge Systems , 2003 .

[55]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[58]  Technology transfer by multinationals , 2003 .

[59]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[60]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[61]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[63]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[64]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[65]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[66]  P. Drucker.  Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge , 1999, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[67]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  Knowledge Gathering, Team Capabilities, and Project Performance in Challenging Work Environments , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[68]  M. Lobo,et al.  WHEN TASK COMPETENCE IS IRRELEVANT: THE ROLE OF INTERPERSONAL AFFECT IN INSTRUMENTAL TIES. , 2007 .