A Philosophically Informed Teaching Proposal on the Topic of Energy for Students Aged 11–14

Learning about energy is recognized as an important objective of science teaching starting from the elementary school. This creates the need for teaching simplifications that compromise the abstract nature of this concept with students’ need for a satisfactory qualitative definition. Conventional teaching approaches have failed to respond to this need in a productive manner. In an attempt to maintain consistency with how energy is understood in physics, they tend to either provide abstract definitions or bypass the question what is energy?, which is vitally important to students. In this paper, we describe the epistemological barriers that are inherent in conventional attempts to introduce energy as a physical quantity and we suggest that shifting the discussion to a philosophically-oriented context could provide a means to address them in a productive manner. We propose a teaching approach, for students in the age range 11–14, that introduces energy as an entity in a theoretical framework that is invented and gradually elaborated in an attempt to analyze the behavior of diverse physical systems, and especially the various changes they undergo, using a coherent perspective. This theoretical framework provides an epistemologically appropriate context that lends meaning to energy and its various features (i.e. transfer, form conversion, conservation and degradation). We argue that this philosophically informed teaching transformation provides a possible means to overcome the various shortcomings that typically characterize attempts to introduce and elaborate the construct of energy while at the same time it allows integrating, in a meaningful and coherent manner, learning objectives relevant to the understanding of the Nature of Science (NOS), which is recognized as a valuable component of learning in science. In this paper, we outline the rationale underlying this teaching approach and describe a proposed activity sequence that illustrates our proposal.

[1]  C. Taylor.  Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation , 1996 .

[2]  Ej Wood.  European journal of science education , 1979 .

[3]  Mary Ratcliffe,et al.  What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community , 2003 .

[4]  Yvonne J. Meichtry.  Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development , 1992 .

[5]  Gary Williams,et al.  Another go at energy , 2003 .

[6]  Rola Khishfe,et al.  Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science. , 2002 .

[7]  Jon Ogborn.  Energy, Change, Difference and Danger. , 1990 .

[8]  Rola Khishfe,et al.  Teaching Nature of Science within a Controversial Topic: Integrated versus Nonintegrated. , 2006 .

[9]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[10]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[11]  R. Driver,et al.  Students' use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situations , 1985 .

[12]  R. Duit,et al.  Students' conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—an interpretive study , 1993 .

[13]  E. Berg,et al.  Teaching energy: a systems approach , 1993 .

[14]  R. Romer,et al.  Heat is not a noun , 2001 .

[15]  James Evans,et al.  Physics, the Human Adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and Beyond , 2001 .

[16]  H Goldring,et al.  Students' difficulties with energy and related concepts , 1994 .

[17]  Xueli Zou,et al.  Multiple representations of work-energy processes , 2001 .

[18]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[19]  J. Olson,et al.  The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents , 1998 .

[20]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit , 2003 .

[21]  J. Ogborn.  Energy and Fuel: The Meaning of "The Go of Things.". , 1986 .

[22]  E. D. Klemke,et al.  Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[23]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Investigation of students' reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course , 2004 .

[24]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on science teachers' conceptual understanding of physics , 2002 .

[25]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Avoiding De-Natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science , 1998 .

[26]  Michael E. Loverude.  Student Understanding of The First Law of Thermodynamics , 2002 .

[27]  R. Boohan,et al.  Differences, energy and change : a simple approach through pictures , 1996 .

[28]  D. M. Watts,et al.  Some alternative views of energy , 1983 .

[29]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .

[30]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[31]  Brian Alters,et al.  Whose nature of science , 1997 .

[32]  R. Duit.  Understanding Energy as a Conserved Quantity‐‐Remarks on the Article by R. U. Sexl , 1981 .

[33]  Mekritt E. Kimball.  Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers , 1967 .

[34]  Sukjin Kang,et al.  Examining students' views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders , 2005 .

[35]  Ricardo Trumper,et al.  Teaching of Energy Issues: A Debate Proposal for a Global Reorientation , 2007 .

[36]  K. Ross.  Matter Scatter and Energy Anarchy. The Second Law of Thermodynamics is Simply Common Experience. , 1988 .

[37]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student understanding of the work‐energy and impulse‐momentum theorems , 1987 .

[38]  R. Bell.  Perusing Padora's Box: Exploring The What, When, And How Of Nature Of Science Instruction , 2006 .

[39]  G. McClelland.  Energy in school science , 1989 .

[40]  Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting , 2006 .

[41]  S. Psillos,et al.  The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science , 2008 .

[42]  A. H. Verdonk,et al.  ‘Work’ and ‘Heat’: on a road towards thermodynamics , 1994 .

[43]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[44]  Mark Ellse.  Transferring Not Transforming Energy. , 1988 .

[45]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Learning the Energy Concept in School--Empirical Results from the Philippines and West Germany. , 1984 .

[46]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[47]  J. Solomon.  Teaching the conservation of energy , 1985 .