Attractiveness Is Multimodal: Beauty Is Also in the Nose and Ear of the Beholder

Attractiveness plays a central role in human non-verbal communication and has been broadly examined in diverse subfields of contemporary psychology. Researchers have garnered compelling evidence in support of the evolutionary functions of physical attractiveness and its role in our daily lives, while at the same time, having largely ignored the significant contribution of non-visual modalities and the relationships among them. Acoustic and olfactory cues can, separately or in combination, strongly influence the perceived attractiveness of an individual and therefore attitudes and actions toward that person. Here, we discuss the relative importance of visual, auditory and olfactory traits in judgments of attractiveness, and review neural and behavioral studies that support the highly complex and multimodal nature of person perception. Further, we discuss three alternative evolutionary hypotheses aimed at explaining the function of multiple indices of attractiveness. In this review, we provide several lines of evidence supporting the importance of the voice, body odor, and facial and body appearance in the perception of attractiveness and mate preferences, and therefore the critical need to incorporate cross-modal perception and multisensory integration into future research on human physical attractiveness.

[1]  M. Moshkin,et al.  Scent recognition of infected status in humans. , 2012, The journal of sexual medicine.

[2]  P. Randall,et al.  Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: Waist–hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness , 2007 .

[3]  M. Schleidt,et al.  A cross-cultural study on the attitude towards personal odors , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[4]  G. Claridge,et al.  Not just a pretty face: physical attractiveness and perfectionism in the risk for eating disorders. , 2000, The International journal of eating disorders.

[5]  A. Figueredo,et al.  A Life-History Model of Human Fitness Indicators , 2010, Biodemography and social biology.

[6]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Phunny Stuph.

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference , 1999, Nature.

[8]  D. Feinberg Are human faces and voices ornaments signaling common underlying cues to mate value? , 2008 .

[9]  M. Rantala,et al.  Male steroid hormones and female preference for male body odor , 2006 .

[10]  M. Haselton,et al.  Body odor attractiveness as a cue of impending ovulation in women: Evidence from a study using hormone-confirmed ovulation , 2012, Hormones and Behavior.

[11]  D. Feinberg,et al.  Men's Preferences for Women's Femininity in Dynamic Cross-Modal Stimuli , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Agnieszka Sorokowska,et al.  Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder but Ugliness Culturally Universal? Facial Preferences of Polish and Yali (Papua) People , 2013, Evolutionary Psychology.

[13]  A. Sorokowska Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli , 2013 .

[14]  A. Little,et al.  Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perceptions of speaker cooperativeness , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  J. Havlíček,et al.  Patterns of MHC‐dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta‐analysis , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[16]  J. Havlíček,et al.  Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: A cross-cultural study , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Men's voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men , 2007 .

[18]  S. Craig Roberts,et al.  Family Scents: Developmental Changes in the Perception of Kin Body Odor? , 2010, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  D. Maestripieri,et al.  Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  N Guéguen Effect of a Perfume on Prosocial Behavior of Pedestrians , 2001, Psychological reports.

[21]  S. Campanella,et al.  Integrating face and voice in person perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Geoffrey P. Miller,et al.  Intelligence tests with higher g-loadings show higher correlations with body symmetry: Evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability , 2005 .

[23]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Is the Perception of Dietary Odour Cues Linked to Sexual Selection in Humans , 2013 .

[24]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Contributions of the face and body to overall attractiveness , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  S. Delplanque,et al.  Androstadienone’s influence on the perception of facial and vocal attractiveness is not sex specific , 2016, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[26]  Agnieszka Sorokowska Assessing Personality Using Body Odor: Differences Between Children and Adults , 2013, Journal of nonverbal behavior.

[27]  J. Liénard,et al.  Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Drew H. Bailey,et al.  Women's attractiveness changes with estradiol and progesterone across the ovulatory cycle , 2013, Hormones and Behavior.

[29]  L. DeBruine,et al.  Sexual Selection on Human Faces and Voices , 2012, Journal of sex research.

[30]  Susan M. Hughes,et al.  What sounds beautiful looks beautiful stereotype , 2016 .

[31]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate choice contexts , 2008 .

[32]  A. Møller,et al.  Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  Michael A. Stefanone,et al.  Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  D. Feinberg,et al.  Vocal Attractiveness , 2018, The Oxford Handbook of Voice Perception.

[35]  K. Grammer,et al.  Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[36]  R. Lerner,et al.  Effects of Age, Sex, and Physical Attractiveness on Child-Peer Relations, Academic Performance, and Elementary School Adjustment. , 1977 .

[37]  S. Craig Roberts,et al.  MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review , 2009, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[38]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex , 2000, Nature.

[39]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Jovana Radovanovic,et al.  Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder , 2014 .

[41]  Amanda C. Hahn,et al.  Changes in salivary estradiol predict changes in women's preferences for vocal masculinity , 2014, Hormones and Behavior.

[42]  K. Scherer Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  A. Little,et al.  Adaptation to Faces and Voices , 2013, Psychological science.

[44]  S. Gangestad,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS , 2005 .

[45]  R. Pipitone,et al.  Women's voice attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle , 2008 .

[46]  C. Delon-Martin,et al.  Odor mental imagery in non-experts in odors: a paradox? , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Are there vocal cues to human developmental stability? Relationships between facial fluctuating asymmetry and voice attractiveness. , 2017, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[48]  Lucy Johnston,et al.  Screening job applicants : The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality , 2000 .

[49]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[50]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Effects of experimental manipulation of male secondary sex characters on female mate preference in red jungle fowl , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  G. Miller How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. , 1998 .

[52]  Hannah M. Rowland,et al.  Face, body and speech cues independently predict judgments of attractiveness , 2009 .

[53]  Thomas E. Currie,et al.  The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness , 2009 .

[54]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Carin Perilloux,et al.  More than just a pretty face: Men's priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus long-term mating contexts , 2010 .

[56]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  Jaroslav Flegr,et al.  Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status , 2005, Biology Letters.

[58]  G. Weisfeld,et al.  Possible olfaction-based mechanisms in human kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[59]  G. Miller,et al.  Mental Traits as Fitness Indicators: Expanding Evolutionary Psychology's Adaptationism , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[60]  A. Little,et al.  Body Odor Quality Predicts Behavioral Attractiveness in Humans , 2011, Archives of sexual behavior.

[61]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans , 2005, Biology Letters.

[62]  John Sabini,et al.  Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  The spandrels of Santa Barbara? A new perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm , 2015 .

[64]  J. Lundström,et al.  The Smell of Age: Perception and Discrimination of Body Odors of Different Ages , 2012, PloS one.

[65]  N. Lass,et al.  Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  Paola Viganò,et al.  “You are so beautiful”*: Behind women’s attractiveness towards the biology of reproduction: a narrative review , 2012, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[67]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[68]  M. Shriver,et al.  Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men's traits , 2013 .

[69]  G. Miller,et al.  Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence. , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[70]  K. Grammer,et al.  The Body and Face of Woman: One Ornament that Signals Quality? , 1999 .

[71]  D. Feinberg,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Return to Oz : Voice Pitch Facilitates Assessments of Men ’ s Body Size , 2014 .

[72]  D. Howrigan,et al.  Humor as a Mental Fitness Indicator , 2008, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[73]  Mariella Pazzaglia,et al.  Sounds and scents in (social) action , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.